Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

AMPS FOR CHRIST
Joel ConnellEnid SnarbErika AndersonHenry BarnesTara TaviGownsLonesome Whistle BlowsAWE

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 1 day ago
Comments: 0

jacierlogyn
Last login: 3 days ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Erika M. Anderson

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • AMPS FOR CHRIST
    AMPS FOR CHRIST band photo
  • AWE
  • Gowns
  • Lonesome Whistle Blows

Connected Musicians

  • Enid Snarb
  • Erika Anderson
  • Henry Barnes
  • Joel Connell
  • Tara Tavi

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
26.67% of network
(576)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (26.67%)
  • Enid Snarb (1.67%)
  • Erika Anderson (1.67%)
  • Henry Barnes (1.67%)
  • Joel Connell (1.67%)
  • Tara Tavi (1.67%)
  • AWE (1.67%)
  • Gowns (1.67%)
  • Lonesome Whistle Blows (1.67%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
AMPS FOR CHRIST 60.00%
Influence Score
i
10.00% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (10.00%)
  • AMPS FOR CHRIST (10.00%)
  • Enid Snarb (10.00%)
  • Erika Anderson (10.00%)
  • Henry Barnes (10.00%)
  • Joel Connell (10.00%)
  • Tara Tavi (10.00%)
  • AWE (10.00%)
  • Gowns (10.00%)
  • Lonesome Whistle Blows (10.00%)
Direct Connections 8

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 4) = 4
$outbound = max(1, 4) = 4

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 4 * 4 = 16
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 4 / 4 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 9 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 16 *
                           ( 36 [AMPS FOR CHRIST] *
                            1 [Enid Snarb] *
                            1 [Erika Anderson] *
                            1 [Henry Barnes] *
                            1 [Joel Connell] *
                            1 [Tara Tavi] *
                            1 [AWE] *
                            1 [Gowns] *
                            1 [Lonesome Whistle Blows]
                           )

                         = 576

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [AMPS FOR CHRIST] *
                            1 [Enid Snarb] *
                            1 [Erika Anderson] *
                            1 [Henry Barnes] *
                            1 [Joel Connell] *
                            1 [Tara Tavi] *
                            1 [AWE] *
                            1 [Gowns] *
                            1 [Lonesome Whistle Blows]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 4 Tags on post
Inbound 4 Posts tagging this
Connections 9 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 16
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
26.67% (576 overall)
  • This Post (26.67%)
  • Enid Snarb (1.67%)
  • Erika Anderson (1.67%)
  • Henry Barnes (1.67%)
  • Joel Connell (1.67%)
  • Tara Tavi (1.67%)
  • AWE (1.67%)
  • Gowns (1.67%)
  • Lonesome Whistle Blows (1.67%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
AMPS FOR CHRIST 60.00%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
10.00% (1 overall)
  • This Post (10.00%)
  • AMPS FOR CHRIST (10.00%)
  • Enid Snarb (10.00%)
  • Erika Anderson (10.00%)
  • Henry Barnes (10.00%)
  • Joel Connell (10.00%)
  • Tara Tavi (10.00%)
  • AWE (10.00%)
  • Gowns (10.00%)
  • Lonesome Whistle Blows (10.00%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
AMPS FOR CHRIST ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1
Enid Snarb ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Erika Anderson ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Henry Barnes ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Joel Connell ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Tara Tavi ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
AWE ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Gowns ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Lonesome Whistle Blows ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Lonesome Whistle Blows ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Gowns ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
AWE ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Tara Tavi ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Joel Connell ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Henry Barnes ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Erika Anderson ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Enid Snarb ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
AMPS FOR CHRIST ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (4)
AMPS FOR CHRIST
AWE
Gowns
Lonesome Whistle Blows
Inbound Posts (4)
AMPS FOR CHRIST
AWE
Gowns
Lonesome Whistle Blows
Last calculated: Jul 2, 1:59 PM
11

Related Content

No related content found.