Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Dan Lilker
Nuclear Assault
Anthony BramanteJohn ConnellyScott DuBoysScott MetaxasGlenn EvansDave DipietroDanny LilkerErik Burke

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 2 days ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Derek Lord (2)

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Nuclear Assault
    Nuclear Assault band photo

Connected Musicians

  • Anthony Bramante
  • Dan Lilker
    Dan Lilker band photo
  • Danny Lilker
  • Dave Dipietro
  • Eric Paone
  • Erik Burke
  • Glenn Evans
  • John Connelly
  • Scott DuBoys
  • Scott Metaxas

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
0.11% of network
(5.08B)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (0.11%)
  • Glenn Evans (1.03%)
  • Dave Dipietro (1.03%)
  • Erik Burke (0.46%)
  • John Connelly (0.11%)
  • Scott DuBoys (0.11%)
  • Scott Metaxas (0.11%)
  • Anthony Bramante (0.11%)
  • Eric Paone (0.11%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Danny Lilker 45.82%Dan Lilker 37.11%Nuclear Assault 13.86%
Influence Score
i
8.33% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (8.33%)
  • John Connelly (8.33%)
  • Nuclear Assault (8.33%)
  • Glenn Evans (8.33%)
  • Scott DuBoys (8.33%)
  • Scott Metaxas (8.33%)
  • Dan Lilker (8.33%)
  • Anthony Bramante (8.33%)
  • Danny Lilker (8.33%)
  • Dave Dipietro (8.33%)
  • Erik Burke (8.33%)
  • Eric Paone (8.33%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 11 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [John Connelly] *
                            121 [Nuclear Assault] *
                            9 [Glenn Evans] *
                            1 [Scott DuBoys] *
                            1 [Scott Metaxas] *
                            324 [Dan Lilker] *
                            1 [Anthony Bramante] *
                            400 [Danny Lilker] *
                            9 [Dave Dipietro] *
                            4 [Erik Burke] *
                            1 [Eric Paone]
                           )

                         = 5.08B

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [John Connelly] *
                            1 [Nuclear Assault] *
                            1 [Glenn Evans] *
                            1 [Scott DuBoys] *
                            1 [Scott Metaxas] *
                            1 [Dan Lilker] *
                            1 [Anthony Bramante] *
                            1 [Danny Lilker] *
                            1 [Dave Dipietro] *
                            1 [Erik Burke] *
                            1 [Eric Paone]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 11 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
0.11% (5.08B overall)
  • This Post (0.11%)
  • Glenn Evans (1.03%)
  • Dave Dipietro (1.03%)
  • Erik Burke (0.46%)
  • John Connelly (0.11%)
  • Scott DuBoys (0.11%)
  • Scott Metaxas (0.11%)
  • Anthony Bramante (0.11%)
  • Eric Paone (0.11%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Danny Lilker 45.82%Dan Lilker 37.11%Nuclear Assault 13.86%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
8.33% (1 overall)
  • This Post (8.33%)
  • John Connelly (8.33%)
  • Nuclear Assault (8.33%)
  • Glenn Evans (8.33%)
  • Scott DuBoys (8.33%)
  • Scott Metaxas (8.33%)
  • Dan Lilker (8.33%)
  • Anthony Bramante (8.33%)
  • Danny Lilker (8.33%)
  • Dave Dipietro (8.33%)
  • Erik Burke (8.33%)
  • Eric Paone (8.33%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
John Connelly ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Nuclear Assault ↗
Str: 121Inf: 1
Glenn Evans ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Scott DuBoys ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Scott Metaxas ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Dan Lilker ↗
Str: 324Inf: 1
Anthony Bramante ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Danny Lilker ↗
Str: 400Inf: 1
Dave Dipietro ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Erik Burke ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Eric Paone ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Eric Paone ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Erik Burke ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Dave Dipietro ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Danny Lilker ↗
Str: 400Inf: 1
Anthony Bramante ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Dan Lilker ↗
Str: 324Inf: 1
Scott Metaxas ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Scott DuBoys ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Glenn Evans ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Nuclear Assault ↗
Str: 121Inf: 1
John Connelly ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
Nuclear Assault
Inbound Posts (1)
Nuclear Assault
Last calculated: Jun 25, 5:50 AM
36

Related Content

No related content found.