Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Patrick BoleijSevere TortureMarvin VriesdeEric de WindtSeth van de LooThijs van LaarhovenDamiën Kerpentier

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 10 hours ago
Comments: 0

Francesca Ladybird
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Matthew Leech
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 1

Jessica
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Darragh Lennon
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Cathal Kennedy
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Dennis Schreurs

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Severe Torture

Connected Musicians

  • Damiën Kerpentier
  • Eric de Windt
  • Marvin Vriesde
  • Patrick Boleij
  • Seth van de Loo
  • Thijs van Laarhoven

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
0.89% of network
(451.6K)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (0.89%)
  • Seth van de Loo (32.14%)
  • Eric de Windt (14.29%)
  • Patrick Boleij (3.57%)
  • Marvin Vriesde (3.57%)
  • Thijs van Laarhoven (0.89%)
  • Damiën Kerpentier (0.89%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Severe Torture 43.75%
Influence Score
i
12.50% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (12.50%)
  • Severe Torture (12.50%)
  • Patrick Boleij (12.50%)
  • Seth van de Loo (12.50%)
  • Thijs van Laarhoven (12.50%)
  • Marvin Vriesde (12.50%)
  • Eric de Windt (12.50%)
  • Damiën Kerpentier (12.50%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 7 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 49 [Severe Torture] *
                            4 [Patrick Boleij] *
                            36 [Seth van de Loo] *
                            1 [Thijs van Laarhoven] *
                            4 [Marvin Vriesde] *
                            16 [Eric de Windt] *
                            1 [Damiën Kerpentier]
                           )

                         = 451.6K

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Severe Torture] *
                            1 [Patrick Boleij] *
                            1 [Seth van de Loo] *
                            1 [Thijs van Laarhoven] *
                            1 [Marvin Vriesde] *
                            1 [Eric de Windt] *
                            1 [Damiën Kerpentier]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 7 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
0.89% (451.6K overall)
  • This Post (0.89%)
  • Seth van de Loo (32.14%)
  • Eric de Windt (14.29%)
  • Patrick Boleij (3.57%)
  • Marvin Vriesde (3.57%)
  • Thijs van Laarhoven (0.89%)
  • Damiën Kerpentier (0.89%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Severe Torture 43.75%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
12.50% (1 overall)
  • This Post (12.50%)
  • Severe Torture (12.50%)
  • Patrick Boleij (12.50%)
  • Seth van de Loo (12.50%)
  • Thijs van Laarhoven (12.50%)
  • Marvin Vriesde (12.50%)
  • Eric de Windt (12.50%)
  • Damiën Kerpentier (12.50%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Severe Torture ↗
Str: 49Inf: 1
Patrick Boleij ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Seth van de Loo ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1
Thijs van Laarhoven ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Marvin Vriesde ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Eric de Windt ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Damiën Kerpentier ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Damiën Kerpentier ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Eric de Windt ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Marvin Vriesde ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Thijs van Laarhoven ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Seth van de Loo ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1
Patrick Boleij ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Severe Torture ↗
Str: 49Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
Severe Torture
Inbound Posts (1)
Severe Torture
Last calculated: Sep 21, 12:49 AM
23

Related Content

No related content found.