Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Maurice SwinkelsDeinonychus fossilsDeinonychus paleoecologyDeinonychusDeinonychus size comparisonsOsteology of Deinonychus antirrhopus

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 5 hours ago
Comments: 0

jacierlogyn
Last login: 4 days ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Deinonychus life restorations

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Deinonychus

Connected Musicians

  • Deinonychus fossils
  • Deinonychus paleoecology
  • Deinonychus size comparisons
  • Maurice Swinkels
  • Osteology of Deinonychus antirrhopus

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
1.30% of network
(1.3K)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (1.30%)
  • Deinonychus fossils (1.30%)
  • Deinonychus paleoecology (1.30%)
  • Deinonychus size comparisons (1.30%)
  • Osteology of Deinonychus antirrhopus (1.30%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Deinonychus 46.75%Maurice Swinkels 46.75%
Influence Score
i
14.29% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (14.29%)
  • Deinonychus (14.29%)
  • Maurice Swinkels (14.29%)
  • Deinonychus fossils (14.29%)
  • Deinonychus paleoecology (14.29%)
  • Deinonychus size comparisons (14.29%)
  • Osteology of Deinonychus antirrhopus (14.29%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 6 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 36 [Deinonychus] *
                            36 [Maurice Swinkels] *
                            1 [Deinonychus fossils] *
                            1 [Deinonychus paleoecology] *
                            1 [Deinonychus size comparisons] *
                            1 [Osteology of Deinonychus antirrhopus]
                           )

                         = 1.3K

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Deinonychus] *
                            1 [Maurice Swinkels] *
                            1 [Deinonychus fossils] *
                            1 [Deinonychus paleoecology] *
                            1 [Deinonychus size comparisons] *
                            1 [Osteology of Deinonychus antirrhopus]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 6 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
1.30% (1.3K overall)
  • This Post (1.30%)
  • Deinonychus fossils (1.30%)
  • Deinonychus paleoecology (1.30%)
  • Deinonychus size comparisons (1.30%)
  • Osteology of Deinonychus antirrhopus (1.30%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Deinonychus 46.75%Maurice Swinkels 46.75%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
14.29% (1 overall)
  • This Post (14.29%)
  • Deinonychus (14.29%)
  • Maurice Swinkels (14.29%)
  • Deinonychus fossils (14.29%)
  • Deinonychus paleoecology (14.29%)
  • Deinonychus size comparisons (14.29%)
  • Osteology of Deinonychus antirrhopus (14.29%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Deinonychus ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1
Maurice Swinkels ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1
Deinonychus fossils ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Deinonychus paleoecology ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Deinonychus size comparisons ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Osteology of Deinonychus antirrhopus ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Osteology of Deinonychus antirrhopus ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Deinonychus size comparisons ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Deinonychus paleoecology ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Deinonychus fossils ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Maurice Swinkels ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1
Deinonychus ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
Deinonychus
Inbound Posts (1)
Deinonychus
Last calculated: Jul 3, 12:44 AM
20

Related Content

No related content found.