Skip to content

Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

David L. MillerPVTLaurence PikeRichard PikeMonty Kelly101 StringsAl Sherman

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 3 days ago
Comments: 0

Francesca Ladybird
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Matthew Leech
Last login: 3 months ago
Comments: 1

Jessica
Last login: 3 months ago
Comments: 0

Darragh Lennon
Last login: 3 months ago
Comments: 0

Cathal Kennedy
Last login: 3 months ago
Comments: 0

Dave Miller

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • 101 Strings
  • PVT

Connected Musicians

  • Al Sherman
  • David L. Miller
  • Laurence Pike
  • Monty Kelly
  • Richard Pike

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
4.00% of network
(147.5K)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (4.00%)
  • 101 Strings (16.00%)
  • PVT (9.00%)
  • David L. Miller (4.00%)
  • Richard Pike (1.00%)
  • Al Sherman (1.00%)
  • Monty Kelly (1.00%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Laurence Pike 64.00%
Influence Score
i
12.50% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (12.50%)
  • PVT (12.50%)
  • Richard Pike (12.50%)
  • Laurence Pike (12.50%)
  • 101 Strings (12.50%)
  • David L. Miller (12.50%)
  • Al Sherman (12.50%)
  • Monty Kelly (12.50%)
Direct Connections 4

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 2) = 2
$outbound = max(1, 2) = 2

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 2 * 2 = 4
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 2 / 2 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 7 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 4 *
                           ( 9 [PVT] *
                            1 [Richard Pike] *
                            64 [Laurence Pike] *
                            16 [101 Strings] *
                            4 [David L. Miller] *
                            1 [Al Sherman] *
                            1 [Monty Kelly]
                           )

                         = 147.5K

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [PVT] *
                            1 [Richard Pike] *
                            1 [Laurence Pike] *
                            1 [101 Strings] *
                            1 [David L. Miller] *
                            1 [Al Sherman] *
                            1 [Monty Kelly]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 2 Tags on post
Inbound 2 Posts tagging this
Connections 7 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 4
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
4.00% (147.5K overall)
  • This Post (4.00%)
  • 101 Strings (16.00%)
  • PVT (9.00%)
  • David L. Miller (4.00%)
  • Richard Pike (1.00%)
  • Al Sherman (1.00%)
  • Monty Kelly (1.00%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Laurence Pike 64.00%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
12.50% (1 overall)
  • This Post (12.50%)
  • PVT (12.50%)
  • Richard Pike (12.50%)
  • Laurence Pike (12.50%)
  • 101 Strings (12.50%)
  • David L. Miller (12.50%)
  • Al Sherman (12.50%)
  • Monty Kelly (12.50%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
PVT ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Richard Pike ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Laurence Pike ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1
101 Strings ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
David L. Miller ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Al Sherman ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Monty Kelly ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Monty Kelly ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Al Sherman ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
David L. Miller ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
101 Strings ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Laurence Pike ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1
Richard Pike ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
PVT ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (2)
101 Strings
PVT
Inbound Posts (2)
PVT
101 Strings
Last calculated: Oct 27, 5:45 AM
23

Related Content

No related content found.

A Muso community