Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Hugh SwartsThinking Fellers Union Local 282Paul Bergmann (2)
Gino Robair
Mark DaviesJay PagetAnne EickelbergBrian Hageman

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 2 days ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Dave Hamburger

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Thinking Fellers Union Local 282

Connected Musicians

  • Anne Eickelberg
  • Brian Hageman
  • Gino Robair
    Gino Robair band photo
  • Hugh Swarts
  • Jay Paget
  • Mark Davies
  • Paul Bergmann (2)

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
0.21% of network
(409.6K)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (0.21%)
  • Anne Eickelberg (0.21%)
  • Brian Hageman (0.21%)
  • Hugh Swarts (0.21%)
  • Mark Davies (0.21%)
  • Paul Bergmann (2) (0.21%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Gino Robair 82.30%Thinking Fellers Union Local 282 13.17%Jay Paget 3.29%
Influence Score
i
11.11% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (11.11%)
  • Thinking Fellers Union Local 282 (11.11%)
  • Anne Eickelberg (11.11%)
  • Brian Hageman (11.11%)
  • Hugh Swarts (11.11%)
  • Mark Davies (11.11%)
  • Gino Robair (11.11%)
  • Jay Paget (11.11%)
  • Paul Bergmann (2) (11.11%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 8 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 64 [Thinking Fellers Union Local 282] *
                            1 [Anne Eickelberg] *
                            1 [Brian Hageman] *
                            1 [Hugh Swarts] *
                            1 [Mark Davies] *
                            400 [Gino Robair] *
                            16 [Jay Paget] *
                            1 [Paul Bergmann (2)]
                           )

                         = 409.6K

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Thinking Fellers Union Local 282] *
                            1 [Anne Eickelberg] *
                            1 [Brian Hageman] *
                            1 [Hugh Swarts] *
                            1 [Mark Davies] *
                            1 [Gino Robair] *
                            1 [Jay Paget] *
                            1 [Paul Bergmann (2)]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 8 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
0.21% (409.6K overall)
  • This Post (0.21%)
  • Anne Eickelberg (0.21%)
  • Brian Hageman (0.21%)
  • Hugh Swarts (0.21%)
  • Mark Davies (0.21%)
  • Paul Bergmann (2) (0.21%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Gino Robair 82.30%Thinking Fellers Union Local 282 13.17%Jay Paget 3.29%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
11.11% (1 overall)
  • This Post (11.11%)
  • Thinking Fellers Union Local 282 (11.11%)
  • Anne Eickelberg (11.11%)
  • Brian Hageman (11.11%)
  • Hugh Swarts (11.11%)
  • Mark Davies (11.11%)
  • Gino Robair (11.11%)
  • Jay Paget (11.11%)
  • Paul Bergmann (2) (11.11%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Thinking Fellers Union Local 282 ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1
Anne Eickelberg ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Brian Hageman ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Hugh Swarts ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Mark Davies ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Gino Robair ↗
Str: 400Inf: 1
Jay Paget ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Paul Bergmann (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Paul Bergmann (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Jay Paget ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Gino Robair ↗
Str: 400Inf: 1
Mark Davies ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Hugh Swarts ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Brian Hageman ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Anne Eickelberg ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Thinking Fellers Union Local 282 ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
Thinking Fellers Union Local 282
Inbound Posts (1)
Thinking Fellers Union Local 282
Last calculated: Jun 24, 11:07 PM
176

Related Content

No related content found.