Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Brian Patton
Jimmy Bower
Mike Williams
Eyehategod
Joe LaCazeVince LeBlancMarc SchultzSteve DaleAaron HillGary Mader

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 1 hour ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 2 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Danny Nick

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Eyehategod
    Eyehategod band photo

Connected Musicians

  • Aaron Hill
  • Brian Patton
  • Gary Mader
  • Jimmy Bower
    Jimmy Bower band photo
  • Joe Fazzio
  • Joe LaCaze
  • Marc Schultz
  • Mike Williams
  • Steve Dale
  • Vince LeBlanc

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
0.29% of network
(2.65B)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (0.29%)
  • Mike Williams (7.16%)
  • Joe Fazzio (2.58%)
  • Brian Patton (2.58%)
  • Gary Mader (1.15%)
  • Joe LaCaze (1.15%)
  • Marc Schultz (1.15%)
  • Aaron Hill (0.29%)
  • Steve Dale (0.29%)
  • Vince LeBlanc (0.29%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Jimmy Bower 48.42%Eyehategod 34.67%
Influence Score
i
8.33% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (8.33%)
  • Mike Williams (8.33%)
  • Jimmy Bower (8.33%)
  • Eyehategod (8.33%)
  • Aaron Hill (8.33%)
  • Gary Mader (8.33%)
  • Joe Fazzio (8.33%)
  • Brian Patton (8.33%)
  • Joe LaCaze (8.33%)
  • Marc Schultz (8.33%)
  • Steve Dale (8.33%)
  • Vince LeBlanc (8.33%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 11 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 25 [Mike Williams] *
                            169 [Jimmy Bower] *
                            121 [Eyehategod] *
                            1 [Aaron Hill] *
                            4 [Gary Mader] *
                            9 [Joe Fazzio] *
                            9 [Brian Patton] *
                            4 [Joe LaCaze] *
                            4 [Marc Schultz] *
                            1 [Steve Dale] *
                            1 [Vince LeBlanc]
                           )

                         = 2.65B

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Mike Williams] *
                            1 [Jimmy Bower] *
                            1 [Eyehategod] *
                            1 [Aaron Hill] *
                            1 [Gary Mader] *
                            1 [Joe Fazzio] *
                            1 [Brian Patton] *
                            1 [Joe LaCaze] *
                            1 [Marc Schultz] *
                            1 [Steve Dale] *
                            1 [Vince LeBlanc]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 11 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
0.29% (2.65B overall)
  • This Post (0.29%)
  • Mike Williams (7.16%)
  • Joe Fazzio (2.58%)
  • Brian Patton (2.58%)
  • Gary Mader (1.15%)
  • Joe LaCaze (1.15%)
  • Marc Schultz (1.15%)
  • Aaron Hill (0.29%)
  • Steve Dale (0.29%)
  • Vince LeBlanc (0.29%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Jimmy Bower 48.42%Eyehategod 34.67%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
8.33% (1 overall)
  • This Post (8.33%)
  • Mike Williams (8.33%)
  • Jimmy Bower (8.33%)
  • Eyehategod (8.33%)
  • Aaron Hill (8.33%)
  • Gary Mader (8.33%)
  • Joe Fazzio (8.33%)
  • Brian Patton (8.33%)
  • Joe LaCaze (8.33%)
  • Marc Schultz (8.33%)
  • Steve Dale (8.33%)
  • Vince LeBlanc (8.33%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Mike Williams ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Jimmy Bower ↗
Str: 169Inf: 1
Eyehategod ↗
Str: 121Inf: 1
Aaron Hill ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Gary Mader ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Joe Fazzio ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Brian Patton ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Joe LaCaze ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Marc Schultz ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Steve Dale ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Vince LeBlanc ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Vince LeBlanc ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Steve Dale ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Marc Schultz ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Joe LaCaze ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Brian Patton ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Joe Fazzio ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Gary Mader ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Aaron Hill ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Eyehategod ↗
Str: 121Inf: 1
Jimmy Bower ↗
Str: 169Inf: 1
Mike Williams ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
Eyehategod
Inbound Posts (1)
Eyehategod
Last calculated: Jun 22, 6:42 PM
37

Related Content

No related content found.