Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Dan Le Sac Vs Scroobius Pip
Scroobius PipDavid Peter Meads

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 4 days ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Daniel Stephens (3)

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Dan Le Sac Vs Scroobius Pip
    Dan Le Sac Vs Scroobius Pip band photo

Connected Musicians

  • David Peter Meads
  • Scroobius Pip

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
4.35% of network
(108)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (4.35%)
  • Scroobius Pip (52.17%)
  • Dan Le Sac Vs Scroobius Pip (39.13%)
  • David Peter Meads (4.35%)
Influence Score
i
23.08% of network
(1.33)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (23.08%)
  • Scroobius Pip (30.77%)
  • Dan Le Sac Vs Scroobius Pip (23.08%)
  • David Peter Meads (23.08%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 3 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 12 [Scroobius Pip] *
                            9 [Dan Le Sac Vs Scroobius Pip] *
                            1 [David Peter Meads]
                           )

                         = 108

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1.33 [Scroobius Pip] *
                            1 [Dan Le Sac Vs Scroobius Pip] *
                            1 [David Peter Meads]
                           )

                         = 1.33
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 3 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
4.35% (108 overall)
  • This Post (4.35%)
  • Scroobius Pip (52.17%)
  • Dan Le Sac Vs Scroobius Pip (39.13%)
  • David Peter Meads (4.35%)
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
23.08% (1.33 overall)
  • This Post (23.08%)
  • Scroobius Pip (30.77%)
  • Dan Le Sac Vs Scroobius Pip (23.08%)
  • David Peter Meads (23.08%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Scroobius Pip ↗
Str: 12Inf: 1.33
Dan Le Sac Vs Scroobius Pip ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
David Peter Meads ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
David Peter Meads ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Dan Le Sac Vs Scroobius Pip ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Scroobius Pip ↗
Str: 12Inf: 1.33

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
Dan Le Sac Vs Scroobius Pip
Inbound Posts (1)
Dan Le Sac Vs Scroobius Pip
Last calculated: Jun 27, 6:22 AM
18

Related Content

No related content found.