Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

David Leonard Boulter
Dan Oggly
David Kitt
Tindersticks
Stuart A. Staples
Stuart Staples
Thomas BelhomNeil FraserMark ColwillAl Macaulay

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 6 hours ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Dan McKinna

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • The Jeevas
  • Tindersticks
    Tindersticks band photo

Connected Musicians

  • Al Macaulay
  • Andy Nixon (5)
  • Crispian Mills
  • David Boulter
  • David Kitt
    David Kitt band photo
  • David Leonard Boulter
    David Leonard Boulter band photo
  • Dickon Hinchliffe
  • Earl Harvin
  • Mark Colwill
  • Neil Fraser
  • Stuart A. Staples
    Stuart A. Staples band photo
  • Stuart Staples
    Stuart Staples band photo
  • Thomas Belhom

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
1.13% of network
(1.05 × 1015)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (1.13%)
  • Earl Harvin (18.08%)
  • Thomas Belhom (7.06%)
  • David Kitt (4.52%)
  • Dan Oggly (4.52%)
  • Stuart Staples (2.54%)
  • David Leonard Boulter (2.54%)
  • Stuart A. Staples (2.54%)
  • The Jeevas (2.54%)
  • Crispian Mills (2.54%)
  • Dickon Hinchliffe (1.13%)
  • Al Macaulay (1.13%)
  • David Boulter (1.13%)
  • Mark Colwill (0.28%)
  • Neil Fraser (0.28%)
  • Andy Nixon (5) (0.28%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Tindersticks 47.74%
Influence Score
i
5.88% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (5.88%)
  • Tindersticks (5.88%)
  • David Kitt (5.88%)
  • Earl Harvin (5.88%)
  • Stuart Staples (5.88%)
  • Dickon Hinchliffe (5.88%)
  • Mark Colwill (5.88%)
  • David Leonard Boulter (5.88%)
  • Thomas Belhom (5.88%)
  • Neil Fraser (5.88%)
  • Al Macaulay (5.88%)
  • Dan Oggly (5.88%)
  • David Boulter (5.88%)
  • Stuart A. Staples (5.88%)
  • The Jeevas (5.88%)
  • Crispian Mills (5.88%)
  • Andy Nixon (5) (5.88%)
Direct Connections 4

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 2) = 2
$outbound = max(1, 2) = 2

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 2 * 2 = 4
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 2 / 2 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 16 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 4 *
                           ( 169 [Tindersticks] *
                            16 [David Kitt] *
                            64 [Earl Harvin] *
                            9 [Stuart Staples] *
                            4 [Dickon Hinchliffe] *
                            1 [Mark Colwill] *
                            9 [David Leonard Boulter] *
                            25 [Thomas Belhom] *
                            1 [Neil Fraser] *
                            4 [Al Macaulay] *
                            16 [Dan Oggly] *
                            4 [David Boulter] *
                            9 [Stuart A. Staples] *
                            9 [The Jeevas] *
                            9 [Crispian Mills] *
                            1 [Andy Nixon (5)]
                           )

                         = 1.05 x 10^15

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Tindersticks] *
                            1 [David Kitt] *
                            1 [Earl Harvin] *
                            1 [Stuart Staples] *
                            1 [Dickon Hinchliffe] *
                            1 [Mark Colwill] *
                            1 [David Leonard Boulter] *
                            1 [Thomas Belhom] *
                            1 [Neil Fraser] *
                            1 [Al Macaulay] *
                            1 [Dan Oggly] *
                            1 [David Boulter] *
                            1 [Stuart A. Staples] *
                            1 [The Jeevas] *
                            1 [Crispian Mills] *
                            1 [Andy Nixon (5)]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 2 Tags on post
Inbound 2 Posts tagging this
Connections 16 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 4
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
1.13% (1.05 × 1015 overall)
  • This Post (1.13%)
  • Earl Harvin (18.08%)
  • Thomas Belhom (7.06%)
  • David Kitt (4.52%)
  • Dan Oggly (4.52%)
  • Stuart Staples (2.54%)
  • David Leonard Boulter (2.54%)
  • Stuart A. Staples (2.54%)
  • The Jeevas (2.54%)
  • Crispian Mills (2.54%)
  • Dickon Hinchliffe (1.13%)
  • Al Macaulay (1.13%)
  • David Boulter (1.13%)
  • Mark Colwill (0.28%)
  • Neil Fraser (0.28%)
  • Andy Nixon (5) (0.28%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Tindersticks 47.74%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
5.88% (1 overall)
  • This Post (5.88%)
  • Tindersticks (5.88%)
  • David Kitt (5.88%)
  • Earl Harvin (5.88%)
  • Stuart Staples (5.88%)
  • Dickon Hinchliffe (5.88%)
  • Mark Colwill (5.88%)
  • David Leonard Boulter (5.88%)
  • Thomas Belhom (5.88%)
  • Neil Fraser (5.88%)
  • Al Macaulay (5.88%)
  • Dan Oggly (5.88%)
  • David Boulter (5.88%)
  • Stuart A. Staples (5.88%)
  • The Jeevas (5.88%)
  • Crispian Mills (5.88%)
  • Andy Nixon (5) (5.88%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Tindersticks ↗
Str: 169Inf: 1
David Kitt ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Earl Harvin ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1
Stuart Staples ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Dickon Hinchliffe ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Mark Colwill ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
David Leonard Boulter ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Thomas Belhom ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Neil Fraser ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Al Macaulay ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Dan Oggly ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
David Boulter ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Stuart A. Staples ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
The Jeevas ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Crispian Mills ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Andy Nixon (5) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Andy Nixon (5) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Crispian Mills ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
The Jeevas ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Stuart A. Staples ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
David Boulter ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Dan Oggly ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Al Macaulay ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Neil Fraser ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Thomas Belhom ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
David Leonard Boulter ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Mark Colwill ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Dickon Hinchliffe ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Stuart Staples ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Earl Harvin ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1
David Kitt ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Tindersticks ↗
Str: 169Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (2)
The Jeevas
Tindersticks
Inbound Posts (2)
Tindersticks
The Jeevas
Last calculated: Jun 28, 1:24 PM
47

Related Content

Figures

  • Dan Oggly