Skip to content

Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Dead Letter Circus
Scott Davey (3)Luke Palmer (4)Kim BenzieRob MaricStewart HillLuke Williams (4)Tom Skerlj

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 3 days ago
Comments: 0

Francesca Ladybird
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Matthew Leech
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 1

Jessica
Last login: 3 months ago
Comments: 0

Darragh Lennon
Last login: 3 months ago
Comments: 0

Cathal Kennedy
Last login: 3 months ago
Comments: 0

Clint Vincent

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Dead Letter Circus
    Dead Letter Circus band photo

Connected Musicians

  • Kim Benzie
  • Luke Palmer (4)
  • Luke Williams (4)
  • Rob Maric
  • Scott Davey (3)
  • Stewart Hill
  • Tom Skerlj

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
1.39% of network
(64)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (1.39%)
  • Kim Benzie (1.39%)
  • Luke Palmer (4) (1.39%)
  • Luke Williams (4) (1.39%)
  • Rob Maric (1.39%)
  • Scott Davey (3) (1.39%)
  • Stewart Hill (1.39%)
  • Tom Skerlj (1.39%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Dead Letter Circus 88.89%
Influence Score
i
11.11% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (11.11%)
  • Dead Letter Circus (11.11%)
  • Kim Benzie (11.11%)
  • Luke Palmer (4) (11.11%)
  • Luke Williams (4) (11.11%)
  • Rob Maric (11.11%)
  • Scott Davey (3) (11.11%)
  • Stewart Hill (11.11%)
  • Tom Skerlj (11.11%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 8 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 64 [Dead Letter Circus] *
                            1 [Kim Benzie] *
                            1 [Luke Palmer (4)] *
                            1 [Luke Williams (4)] *
                            1 [Rob Maric] *
                            1 [Scott Davey (3)] *
                            1 [Stewart Hill] *
                            1 [Tom Skerlj]
                           )

                         = 64

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Dead Letter Circus] *
                            1 [Kim Benzie] *
                            1 [Luke Palmer (4)] *
                            1 [Luke Williams (4)] *
                            1 [Rob Maric] *
                            1 [Scott Davey (3)] *
                            1 [Stewart Hill] *
                            1 [Tom Skerlj]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 8 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
1.39% (64 overall)
  • This Post (1.39%)
  • Kim Benzie (1.39%)
  • Luke Palmer (4) (1.39%)
  • Luke Williams (4) (1.39%)
  • Rob Maric (1.39%)
  • Scott Davey (3) (1.39%)
  • Stewart Hill (1.39%)
  • Tom Skerlj (1.39%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Dead Letter Circus 88.89%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
11.11% (1 overall)
  • This Post (11.11%)
  • Dead Letter Circus (11.11%)
  • Kim Benzie (11.11%)
  • Luke Palmer (4) (11.11%)
  • Luke Williams (4) (11.11%)
  • Rob Maric (11.11%)
  • Scott Davey (3) (11.11%)
  • Stewart Hill (11.11%)
  • Tom Skerlj (11.11%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Dead Letter Circus ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1
Kim Benzie ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Luke Palmer (4) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Luke Williams (4) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Rob Maric ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Scott Davey (3) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Stewart Hill ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Tom Skerlj ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Tom Skerlj ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Stewart Hill ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Scott Davey (3) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Rob Maric ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Luke Williams (4) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Luke Palmer (4) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Kim Benzie ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Dead Letter Circus ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
Dead Letter Circus
Inbound Posts (1)
Dead Letter Circus
Last calculated: Oct 20, 3:22 PM
31

Related Content

No related content found.

A Muso community