How is this calculated?
The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.
// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 2) = 2
$outbound = max(1, 2) = 2
// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 2 * 2 = 4
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 2 / 2 = 1
// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 24 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
= 4 *
( 484 [Possessed] *
81 [Tony Campos] *
4 [Jeff Becerra] *
49 [Larry LaLonde] *
1 [Mike Torrao] *
16 [Emilio Marquez] *
9 [Robert Cardenas] *
1 [Mike Sus] *
25 [Walter Ryan] *
9 [Mark Strassburg] *
9 [Kelly Mclauchlin] *
4 [Daniel Gonzalez (11)] *
1 [Bay Cortez] *
1 [Bob Yost] *
1 [Brian Montana] *
1 [Chris Stolle] *
1 [Dave Couch] *
4 [Mike Pardi] *
1 [Rick Cortez] *
1 [Possessed - Jalometalli 2008] *
1 [Possessed - Party.San Metal Open Air 2017] *
1 [Possessed - Wacken Open Air 2017] *
25 [Possessed (Europe)] *
4 [Daniel Gonzalez]
)
= 1.43 x 10^16
Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
= 1 *
( 1 [Possessed] *
1 [Tony Campos] *
1 [Jeff Becerra] *
1 [Larry LaLonde] *
1 [Mike Torrao] *
1 [Emilio Marquez] *
1 [Robert Cardenas] *
1 [Mike Sus] *
1 [Walter Ryan] *
1 [Mark Strassburg] *
1 [Kelly Mclauchlin] *
1 [Daniel Gonzalez (11)] *
1 [Bay Cortez] *
1 [Bob Yost] *
1 [Brian Montana] *
1 [Chris Stolle] *
1 [Dave Couch] *
1 [Mike Pardi] *
1 [Rick Cortez] *
1 [Possessed - Jalometalli 2008] *
1 [Possessed - Party.San Metal Open Air 2017] *
1 [Possessed - Wacken Open Air 2017] *
1 [Possessed (Europe)] *
1 [Daniel Gonzalez]
)
= 1
Outbound
2
Tags on post
Inbound
2
Posts tagging this
Connections
24
Total nodes
Base Node Strength
4
Base Node Influence
1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
0.54%
(1.43 × 1016 overall)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)Possessed 65.58%Tony Campos 10.98%Larry LaLonde 6.64%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
Connected Network Hierarchy
Sort list by:
Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)