Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Kenny GrohowskiKenneth SchalkMichael MacIvorEddie OrtizCandiriaEric Matthews (3)Danny GrossarthJohn LaMacchiaCarley ComaCarley Gervaís

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 5 days ago
Comments: 0

Cathal Kennedy
Last login: 6 days ago
Comments: 0

jacierlogyn
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Chris Puma

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Candiria

Connected Musicians

  • Carley Coma
  • Carley Gervaís
  • Danny Grossarth
  • Eddie Ortiz
  • Eric Matthews (3)
  • John LaMacchia
  • Julio Arias (2)
  • Kenneth Schalk
  • Kenny Grohowski
  • Michael MacIvor

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
0.29% of network
(6.07M)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (0.29%)
  • Eddie Ortiz (1.18%)
  • Michael MacIvor (1.18%)
  • John LaMacchia (1.18%)
  • Kenneth Schalk (1.18%)
  • Carley Coma (0.29%)
  • Carley Gervaís (0.29%)
  • Danny Grossarth (0.29%)
  • Eric Matthews (3) (0.29%)
  • Julio Arias (2) (0.29%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Kenny Grohowski 57.82%Candiria 35.69%
Influence Score
i
8.33% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (8.33%)
  • Kenny Grohowski (8.33%)
  • Candiria (8.33%)
  • Carley Coma (8.33%)
  • Eddie Ortiz (8.33%)
  • Michael MacIvor (8.33%)
  • John LaMacchia (8.33%)
  • Carley Gervaís (8.33%)
  • Danny Grossarth (8.33%)
  • Eric Matthews (3) (8.33%)
  • Julio Arias (2) (8.33%)
  • Kenneth Schalk (8.33%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 11 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 196 [Kenny Grohowski] *
                            121 [Candiria] *
                            1 [Carley Coma] *
                            4 [Eddie Ortiz] *
                            4 [Michael MacIvor] *
                            4 [John LaMacchia] *
                            1 [Carley Gervaís] *
                            1 [Danny Grossarth] *
                            1 [Eric Matthews (3)] *
                            1 [Julio Arias (2)] *
                            4 [Kenneth Schalk]
                           )

                         = 6.07M

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Kenny Grohowski] *
                            1 [Candiria] *
                            1 [Carley Coma] *
                            1 [Eddie Ortiz] *
                            1 [Michael MacIvor] *
                            1 [John LaMacchia] *
                            1 [Carley Gervaís] *
                            1 [Danny Grossarth] *
                            1 [Eric Matthews (3)] *
                            1 [Julio Arias (2)] *
                            1 [Kenneth Schalk]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 11 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
0.29% (6.07M overall)
  • This Post (0.29%)
  • Eddie Ortiz (1.18%)
  • Michael MacIvor (1.18%)
  • John LaMacchia (1.18%)
  • Kenneth Schalk (1.18%)
  • Carley Coma (0.29%)
  • Carley Gervaís (0.29%)
  • Danny Grossarth (0.29%)
  • Eric Matthews (3) (0.29%)
  • Julio Arias (2) (0.29%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Kenny Grohowski 57.82%Candiria 35.69%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
8.33% (1 overall)
  • This Post (8.33%)
  • Kenny Grohowski (8.33%)
  • Candiria (8.33%)
  • Carley Coma (8.33%)
  • Eddie Ortiz (8.33%)
  • Michael MacIvor (8.33%)
  • John LaMacchia (8.33%)
  • Carley Gervaís (8.33%)
  • Danny Grossarth (8.33%)
  • Eric Matthews (3) (8.33%)
  • Julio Arias (2) (8.33%)
  • Kenneth Schalk (8.33%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Kenny Grohowski ↗
Str: 196Inf: 1
Candiria ↗
Str: 121Inf: 1
Carley Coma ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Eddie Ortiz ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Michael MacIvor ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
John LaMacchia ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Carley Gervaís ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Danny Grossarth ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Eric Matthews (3) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Julio Arias (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Kenneth Schalk ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Kenneth Schalk ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Julio Arias (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Eric Matthews (3) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Danny Grossarth ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Carley Gervaís ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
John LaMacchia ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Michael MacIvor ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Eddie Ortiz ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Carley Coma ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Candiria ↗
Str: 121Inf: 1
Kenny Grohowski ↗
Str: 196Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
CANDIRIA
Inbound Posts (1)
Candiria
Last calculated: Jul 21, 5:13 PM
44

Related Content

No related content found.