Network Profile
View Network Math
Overall Strength
2.09%
of network (6.55 × 1023 )
Direct Connections
8
Node & Network Strength Details
×
How is this calculated? The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the website.
Every tag forms a network link. The pie charts below show each connected post's base strength (PV) and influence (IV) as a share of this post's direct neighbourhood.
Outbound
4
Tags on post
Inbound
4
Posts tagging this
Base Node Strength
16
Base Node Influence
1
Connected Nodes
18
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
2.09%
(6.55 × 1023 overall)
This Post (2.09%) Robin Zielhorst (13.04%) Tony Choy (10.56%) Paul Masvidal (8.34%) Cynic (2) (6.39%) Technical death metal (6.39%) Sean Malone (5.48%) Jason Gobel (4.69%) Jack Kelly (2.09%) Portal (3) (2.09%) Mark Van Erp (1.17%) Tymon Kruidenier (1.17%) Dave Mackay (0.52%) David Senescu (0.52%) Matt Lynch (0.52%) Sean Reinert (0.52%) Tony Teegarden (0.52%) Cynic philosophers (0.52%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart) Cynic 33.38%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
This Post (5.30%) Tony Choy (5.30%) Cynic (5.30%) Dave Mackay (5.30%) Robin Zielhorst (5.30%) David Senescu (5.30%) Jason Gobel (5.30%) Mark Van Erp (5.30%) Matt Lynch (5.30%) Paul Masvidal (5.30%) Jack Kelly (5.30%) Sean Reinert (5.30%) Tony Teegarden (5.30%) Tymon Kruidenier (5.30%) Cynic (2) (5.30%) Portal (3) (5.30%) Cynic philosophers (5.30%) Technical death metal (5.30%) Sean Malone (4.55%)
Connected Network (How neighbours affect this node)
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)
Last calculated math cycle: May 4, 12:04 AM
Close Report
Analyzing Network Connections...
Most Relevant
Most Integral
Depth: 1 Level
Depth: 2 Levels
Depth: 3 Levels
Depth: 4 Levels
Depth: 5 Levels
Depth: 6 Levels
Depth: 7 Levels
Expand All (Max)
👁️ 37 Views
Related Content No related content found.