Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Michael FennellyFelix “Flaco” FalconPhil JonesPhil Jones (3)Crabby AppletonHank HarveyFelix FalconLondon Fog (2)

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Matthew Leech
Last login: 24 hours ago
Comments: 1

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 4 days ago
Comments: 0

Jessica
Last login: 1 week ago
Comments: 0

Darragh Lennon
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Cathal Kennedy
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

jacierlogyn
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Casey Foutz

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Crabby Appleton
  • London Fog (2)

Connected Musicians

  • Felix “Flaco” Falcon
  • Felix Falcon
  • Hank Harvey
  • Michael Fennelly
  • Phil Jones
  • Phil Jones (3)

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
3.60% of network
(38.4K)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (3.60%)
  • Phil Jones (3) (3.60%)
  • Felix Falcon (0.90%)
  • Hank Harvey (0.90%)
  • Phil Jones (0.90%)
  • Felix "Flaco" Falcon (0.90%)
  • London Fog (2) (0.90%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Michael Fennelly 44.14%Crabby Appleton 44.14%
Influence Score
i
11.11% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (11.11%)
  • Michael Fennelly (11.11%)
  • Crabby Appleton (11.11%)
  • Felix Falcon (11.11%)
  • Hank Harvey (11.11%)
  • Phil Jones (11.11%)
  • Phil Jones (3) (11.11%)
  • Felix "Flaco" Falcon (11.11%)
  • London Fog (2) (11.11%)
Direct Connections 4

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 2) = 2
$outbound = max(1, 2) = 2

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 2 * 2 = 4
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 2 / 2 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 8 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 4 *
                           ( 49 [Michael Fennelly] *
                            49 [Crabby Appleton] *
                            1 [Felix Falcon] *
                            1 [Hank Harvey] *
                            1 [Phil Jones] *
                            4 [Phil Jones (3)] *
                            1 [Felix "Flaco" Falcon] *
                            1 [London Fog (2)]
                           )

                         = 38.4K

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Michael Fennelly] *
                            1 [Crabby Appleton] *
                            1 [Felix Falcon] *
                            1 [Hank Harvey] *
                            1 [Phil Jones] *
                            1 [Phil Jones (3)] *
                            1 [Felix "Flaco" Falcon] *
                            1 [London Fog (2)]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 2 Tags on post
Inbound 2 Posts tagging this
Connections 8 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 4
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
3.60% (38.4K overall)
  • This Post (3.60%)
  • Phil Jones (3) (3.60%)
  • Felix Falcon (0.90%)
  • Hank Harvey (0.90%)
  • Phil Jones (0.90%)
  • Felix "Flaco" Falcon (0.90%)
  • London Fog (2) (0.90%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Michael Fennelly 44.14%Crabby Appleton 44.14%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
11.11% (1 overall)
  • This Post (11.11%)
  • Michael Fennelly (11.11%)
  • Crabby Appleton (11.11%)
  • Felix Falcon (11.11%)
  • Hank Harvey (11.11%)
  • Phil Jones (11.11%)
  • Phil Jones (3) (11.11%)
  • Felix "Flaco" Falcon (11.11%)
  • London Fog (2) (11.11%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Michael Fennelly ↗
Str: 49Inf: 1
Crabby Appleton ↗
Str: 49Inf: 1
Felix Falcon ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Hank Harvey ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Phil Jones ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Phil Jones (3) ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Felix "Flaco" Falcon ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
London Fog (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
London Fog (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Felix "Flaco" Falcon ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Phil Jones (3) ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Phil Jones ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Hank Harvey ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Felix Falcon ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Crabby Appleton ↗
Str: 49Inf: 1
Michael Fennelly ↗
Str: 49Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (2)
Crabby Appleton
London Fog (2)
Inbound Posts (2)
Crabby Appleton
London Fog (2)
Last calculated: Aug 8, 11:27 AM
52

Related Content

No related content found.