Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Dick Taylor (2)
Keith Richards
Charlie Watts
Ron Wood
Bill Wyman
Nanker Phelge
Mick Taylor
Brian Jones
Ian StewartTony Chapman

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Darragh Lennon
Last login: 20 hours ago
Comments: 0

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 6 days ago
Comments: 0

Cathal Kennedy
Last login: 7 days ago
Comments: 0

jacierlogyn
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Brian Jones (5)

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Nanker Phelge
  • The Stones

Connected Musicians

  • Bill Wyman
    Bill Wyman band photo
  • Brian Jones
    Brian Jones band photo
  • Charlie Watts
    Charlie Watts band photo
  • Dick Taylor (2)
  • Ian Stewart
  • Keith Richards
    Keith Richards band photo
  • Mick Taylor
    Mick Taylor band photo
  • Ron Wood
  • Tony Chapman

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
0.31% of network
(8.99 × 1018)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (0.31%)
  • Keith Richards (30.84%)
  • Charlie Watts (22.28%)
  • Ron Wood (17.35%)
  • Mick Taylor (9.33%)
  • Bill Wyman (9.33%)
  • The Stones (6.25%)
  • Nanker Phelge (1.93%)
  • Tony Chapman (0.69%)
  • Dick Taylor (2) (0.69%)
  • Brian Jones (0.69%)
  • Ian Stewart (0.31%)
Influence Score
i
8.33% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (8.33%)
  • Mick Taylor (8.33%)
  • Bill Wyman (8.33%)
  • Charlie Watts (8.33%)
  • Ian Stewart (8.33%)
  • Keith Richards (8.33%)
  • Ron Wood (8.33%)
  • Tony Chapman (8.33%)
  • The Stones (8.33%)
  • Dick Taylor (2) (8.33%)
  • Nanker Phelge (8.33%)
  • Brian Jones (8.33%)
Direct Connections 4

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 2) = 2
$outbound = max(1, 2) = 2

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 2 * 2 = 4
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 2 / 2 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 11 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 4 *
                           ( 121 [Mick Taylor] *
                            121 [Bill Wyman] *
                            289 [Charlie Watts] *
                            4 [Ian Stewart] *
                            400 [Keith Richards] *
                            225 [Ron Wood] *
                            9 [Tony Chapman] *
                            81 [The Stones] *
                            9 [Dick Taylor (2)] *
                            25 [Nanker Phelge] *
                            9 [Brian Jones]
                           )

                         = 8.99 x 10^18

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Mick Taylor] *
                            1 [Bill Wyman] *
                            1 [Charlie Watts] *
                            1 [Ian Stewart] *
                            1 [Keith Richards] *
                            1 [Ron Wood] *
                            1 [Tony Chapman] *
                            1 [The Stones] *
                            1 [Dick Taylor (2)] *
                            1 [Nanker Phelge] *
                            1 [Brian Jones]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 2 Tags on post
Inbound 2 Posts tagging this
Connections 11 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 4
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
0.31% (8.99 × 1018 overall)
  • This Post (0.31%)
  • Keith Richards (30.84%)
  • Charlie Watts (22.28%)
  • Ron Wood (17.35%)
  • Mick Taylor (9.33%)
  • Bill Wyman (9.33%)
  • The Stones (6.25%)
  • Nanker Phelge (1.93%)
  • Tony Chapman (0.69%)
  • Dick Taylor (2) (0.69%)
  • Brian Jones (0.69%)
  • Ian Stewart (0.31%)
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
8.33% (1 overall)
  • This Post (8.33%)
  • Mick Taylor (8.33%)
  • Bill Wyman (8.33%)
  • Charlie Watts (8.33%)
  • Ian Stewart (8.33%)
  • Keith Richards (8.33%)
  • Ron Wood (8.33%)
  • Tony Chapman (8.33%)
  • The Stones (8.33%)
  • Dick Taylor (2) (8.33%)
  • Nanker Phelge (8.33%)
  • Brian Jones (8.33%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Mick Taylor ↗
Str: 121Inf: 1
Bill Wyman ↗
Str: 121Inf: 1
Charlie Watts ↗
Str: 289Inf: 1
Ian Stewart ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Keith Richards ↗
Str: 400Inf: 1
Ron Wood ↗
Str: 225Inf: 1
Tony Chapman ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
The Stones ↗
Str: 81Inf: 1
Dick Taylor (2) ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Nanker Phelge ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Brian Jones ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Brian Jones ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Nanker Phelge ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Dick Taylor (2) ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
The Stones ↗
Str: 81Inf: 1
Tony Chapman ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Ron Wood ↗
Str: 225Inf: 1
Keith Richards ↗
Str: 400Inf: 1
Ian Stewart ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Charlie Watts ↗
Str: 289Inf: 1
Bill Wyman ↗
Str: 121Inf: 1
Mick Taylor ↗
Str: 121Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (2)
Nanker Phelge
The Stones
Inbound Posts (2)
The Stones
Nanker Phelge
Last calculated: Jul 22, 2:47 PM
30

Related Content

No related content found.