Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Matt WoodDan Rheault
Bison B.C.
Dan And
Matt Wood (5)Shane Clark (3)James FarwellMasa Anzai

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 8 hours ago
Comments: 0

Francesca Ladybird
Last login: 2 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Matthew Leech
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 1

Jessica
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Darragh Lennon
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Cathal Kennedy
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Brad Mackinnon

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Bison B.C.
    Bison B.C. band photo

Connected Musicians

  • Dan And
    Dan And band photo
  • Dan Rheault
  • James Farwell
  • Masa Anzai
  • Matt Wood
  • Matt Wood (5)
  • Shane Clark (3)

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
1.04% of network
(65.5K)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (1.04%)
  • Dan And (16.67%)
  • Matt Wood (4.17%)
  • Matt Wood (5) (4.17%)
  • Shane Clark (3) (4.17%)
  • James Farwell (1.04%)
  • Masa Anzai (1.04%)
  • Dan Rheault (1.04%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Bison B.C. 66.67%
Influence Score
i
11.11% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (11.11%)
  • Bison B.C. (11.11%)
  • Dan And (11.11%)
  • James Farwell (11.11%)
  • Masa Anzai (11.11%)
  • Matt Wood (11.11%)
  • Dan Rheault (11.11%)
  • Matt Wood (5) (11.11%)
  • Shane Clark (3) (11.11%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 8 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 64 [Bison B.C.] *
                            16 [Dan And] *
                            1 [James Farwell] *
                            1 [Masa Anzai] *
                            4 [Matt Wood] *
                            1 [Dan Rheault] *
                            4 [Matt Wood (5)] *
                            4 [Shane Clark (3)]
                           )

                         = 65.5K

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Bison B.C.] *
                            1 [Dan And] *
                            1 [James Farwell] *
                            1 [Masa Anzai] *
                            1 [Matt Wood] *
                            1 [Dan Rheault] *
                            1 [Matt Wood (5)] *
                            1 [Shane Clark (3)]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 8 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
1.04% (65.5K overall)
  • This Post (1.04%)
  • Dan And (16.67%)
  • Matt Wood (4.17%)
  • Matt Wood (5) (4.17%)
  • Shane Clark (3) (4.17%)
  • James Farwell (1.04%)
  • Masa Anzai (1.04%)
  • Dan Rheault (1.04%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Bison B.C. 66.67%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
11.11% (1 overall)
  • This Post (11.11%)
  • Bison B.C. (11.11%)
  • Dan And (11.11%)
  • James Farwell (11.11%)
  • Masa Anzai (11.11%)
  • Matt Wood (11.11%)
  • Dan Rheault (11.11%)
  • Matt Wood (5) (11.11%)
  • Shane Clark (3) (11.11%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Bison B.C. ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1
Dan And ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
James Farwell ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Masa Anzai ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Matt Wood ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Dan Rheault ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Matt Wood (5) ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Shane Clark (3) ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Shane Clark (3) ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Matt Wood (5) ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Dan Rheault ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Matt Wood ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Masa Anzai ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
James Farwell ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Dan And ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Bison B.C. ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
Bison B.C.
Inbound Posts (1)
Bison B.C.
Last calculated: Sep 17, 7:22 PM
22

Related Content

No related content found.