Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Doogie White
David Readman
Tank (29)
Mark Cross
Barend CourboisCrows (5)Randalica

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 6 hours ago
Comments: 0

Darragh Lennon
Last login: 3 days ago
Comments: 0

Cathal Kennedy
Last login: 1 week ago
Comments: 0

jacierlogyn
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Bobby Schottkowski

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Crows (5)
  • Randalica
  • Tank (29)

Connected Musicians

  • Barend Courbois
  • David Readman
    David Readman band photo
  • Doogie White
    Doogie White band photo
  • Mark Cross
    Mark Cross band photo

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
1.78% of network
(6.92B)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (1.78%)
  • Doogie White (38.74%)
  • Mark Cross (28.46%)
  • David Readman (23.91%)
  • Tank (29) (4.94%)
  • Barend Courbois (1.78%)
  • Crows (5) (0.20%)
  • Randalica (0.20%)
Influence Score
i
12.50% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (12.50%)
  • Tank (29) (12.50%)
  • Crows (5) (12.50%)
  • Randalica (12.50%)
  • Doogie White (12.50%)
  • Mark Cross (12.50%)
  • David Readman (12.50%)
  • Barend Courbois (12.50%)
Direct Connections 6

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 3) = 3
$outbound = max(1, 3) = 3

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 3 * 3 = 9
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 3 / 3 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 7 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 9 *
                           ( 25 [Tank (29)] *
                            1 [Crows (5)] *
                            1 [Randalica] *
                            196 [Doogie White] *
                            144 [Mark Cross] *
                            121 [David Readman] *
                            9 [Barend Courbois]
                           )

                         = 6.92B

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Tank (29)] *
                            1 [Crows (5)] *
                            1 [Randalica] *
                            1 [Doogie White] *
                            1 [Mark Cross] *
                            1 [David Readman] *
                            1 [Barend Courbois]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 3 Tags on post
Inbound 3 Posts tagging this
Connections 7 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 9
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
1.78% (6.92B overall)
  • This Post (1.78%)
  • Doogie White (38.74%)
  • Mark Cross (28.46%)
  • David Readman (23.91%)
  • Tank (29) (4.94%)
  • Barend Courbois (1.78%)
  • Crows (5) (0.20%)
  • Randalica (0.20%)
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
12.50% (1 overall)
  • This Post (12.50%)
  • Tank (29) (12.50%)
  • Crows (5) (12.50%)
  • Randalica (12.50%)
  • Doogie White (12.50%)
  • Mark Cross (12.50%)
  • David Readman (12.50%)
  • Barend Courbois (12.50%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Tank (29) ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Crows (5) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Randalica ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Doogie White ↗
Str: 196Inf: 1
Mark Cross ↗
Str: 144Inf: 1
David Readman ↗
Str: 121Inf: 1
Barend Courbois ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Barend Courbois ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
David Readman ↗
Str: 121Inf: 1
Mark Cross ↗
Str: 144Inf: 1
Doogie White ↗
Str: 196Inf: 1
Randalica ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Crows (5) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Tank (29) ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (3)
Crows (5)
Randalica
Tank (29)
Inbound Posts (3)
Tank (29)
Crows (5)
Randalica
Last calculated: Jul 24, 5:46 PM
43

Related Content

No related content found.