Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

In MourningDaniel LiljekvistJoakim Strandberg NilssonTobias NetzellPierre StamBjörn Pettersson (3)Sebastian SvallandTim Nedergård

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 11 hours ago
Comments: 0

Francesca Ladybird
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Matthew Leech
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 1

Jessica
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Darragh Lennon
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Cathal Kennedy
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Björn Pettersson

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • In Mourning

Connected Musicians

  • Björn Pettersson (3)
  • Daniel Liljekvist
  • Joakim Strandberg Nilsson
  • Pierre Stam
  • Sebastian Svalland
  • Tim Nedergård
  • Tobias Netzell

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
0.67% of network
(589.8K)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (0.67%)
  • Joakim Strandberg Nilsson (6.04%)
  • Pierre Stam (2.68%)
  • Tobias Netzell (2.68%)
  • Tim Nedergård (0.67%)
  • Sebastian Svalland (0.67%)
  • Björn Pettersson (3) (0.67%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
In Mourning 42.95%Daniel Liljekvist 42.95%
Influence Score
i
11.11% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (11.11%)
  • In Mourning (11.11%)
  • Daniel Liljekvist (11.11%)
  • Pierre Stam (11.11%)
  • Tim Nedergård (11.11%)
  • Tobias Netzell (11.11%)
  • Joakim Strandberg Nilsson (11.11%)
  • Sebastian Svalland (11.11%)
  • Björn Pettersson (3) (11.11%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 8 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 64 [In Mourning] *
                            64 [Daniel Liljekvist] *
                            4 [Pierre Stam] *
                            1 [Tim Nedergård] *
                            4 [Tobias Netzell] *
                            9 [Joakim Strandberg Nilsson] *
                            1 [Sebastian Svalland] *
                            1 [Björn Pettersson (3)]
                           )

                         = 589.8K

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [In Mourning] *
                            1 [Daniel Liljekvist] *
                            1 [Pierre Stam] *
                            1 [Tim Nedergård] *
                            1 [Tobias Netzell] *
                            1 [Joakim Strandberg Nilsson] *
                            1 [Sebastian Svalland] *
                            1 [Björn Pettersson (3)]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 8 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
0.67% (589.8K overall)
  • This Post (0.67%)
  • Joakim Strandberg Nilsson (6.04%)
  • Pierre Stam (2.68%)
  • Tobias Netzell (2.68%)
  • Tim Nedergård (0.67%)
  • Sebastian Svalland (0.67%)
  • Björn Pettersson (3) (0.67%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
In Mourning 42.95%Daniel Liljekvist 42.95%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
11.11% (1 overall)
  • This Post (11.11%)
  • In Mourning (11.11%)
  • Daniel Liljekvist (11.11%)
  • Pierre Stam (11.11%)
  • Tim Nedergård (11.11%)
  • Tobias Netzell (11.11%)
  • Joakim Strandberg Nilsson (11.11%)
  • Sebastian Svalland (11.11%)
  • Björn Pettersson (3) (11.11%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
In Mourning ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1
Daniel Liljekvist ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1
Pierre Stam ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Tim Nedergård ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Tobias Netzell ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Joakim Strandberg Nilsson ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Sebastian Svalland ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Björn Pettersson (3) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Björn Pettersson (3) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Sebastian Svalland ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Joakim Strandberg Nilsson ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Tobias Netzell ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Tim Nedergård ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Pierre Stam ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Daniel Liljekvist ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1
In Mourning ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
In Mourning
Inbound Posts (1)
In Mourning
Last calculated: Sep 23, 7:18 AM
27

Related Content

No related content found.