Network Profile
View Network Math
Overall Strength
< 0.01%
of network26 )
Direct Connections
6
Node & Network Strength Details
×
How is this calculated? The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the website.
Every tag forms a network link. The pie charts below show exactly which connected posts are generating the most power for this specific network cluster.
Outbound
3
Tags on post
Inbound
3
Posts tagging this
Base Node Strength
9
Base Node Influence
1
Connected Nodes
21
Network Strength Make-up
< 0.01%
(7.58 × 1026 raw)
This Post (< 0.01%) Tony Garnier (< 0.01%) Roy Nathanson (< 0.01%) Brad Jones (< 0.01%) E.J. Rodriguez (< 0.01%) Jim Nolet (< 0.01%) Sam Bardfeld (< 0.01%) Itaal Shur (< 0.01%) Fabio Morgera (< 0.01%) Genji Siraisi (< 0.01%) Gordon Clay (< 0.01%) Jay Rodriguez (< 0.01%) Richard Worth (< 0.01%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart) Curtis Fowlkes > 99.99% Marc Ribot < 0.01% The Jazz Passengers < 0.01% Barney McAll < 0.01% Jeff Buckley < 0.01% Rob Thomas (2) < 0.01% Ben Perowsky < 0.01% Jonathan Maron < 0.01% Groove Collective < 0.01%
Influence Score Make-up
This Post (4.11%) Curtis Fowlkes (13.76%) The Jazz Passengers (7.76%) Groove Collective (4.11%) Barney McAll (4.11%) Ben Perowsky (4.11%) Brad Jones (4.11%) E.J. Rodriguez (4.11%) Jim Nolet (4.11%) Rob Thomas (2) (4.11%) Roy Nathanson (4.11%) Sam Bardfeld (4.11%) Tony Garnier (4.11%) Fabio Morgera (4.11%) Genji Siraisi (4.11%) Gordon Clay (4.11%) Itaal Shur (4.11%) Jay Rodriguez (4.11%) Jonathan Maron (4.11%) Richard Worth (4.11%) Marc Ribot (2.74%) Jeff Buckley (1.80%)
Connected Network (How neighbours affect this node)
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)
Last calculated math cycle: Apr 30, 1:35 AM
Close Report
Analyzing Network Connections...
Most Relevant
Most Integral
Depth: 1 Level
Depth: 2 Levels
Depth: 3 Levels
Depth: 4 Levels
Depth: 5 Levels
Depth: 6 Levels
Depth: 7 Levels
👁️ 27 Views