How is this calculated?
The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.
// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 6) = 6
$outbound = max(1, 6) = 6
// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 6 * 6 = 36
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 6 / 6 = 1
// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 25 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
= 36 *
( 42 [McGuinness Flint] *
81 [Chris Stewart] *
1.1K [The Cramps] *
256 [Slim Chance] *
121 [Ronnie Lane] *
9 [Charlie Hart] *
4 [Brian Belshaw] *
36 [Bruce Rowland] *
4 [Colin Davey] *
4 [Drew McCulloch] *
64 [Graham Lyle] *
36 [Billy Livsey] *
16 [Jimmy Jewell] *
49 [Steve Bingham] *
4 [Ken Slaven] *
4 [Kevin Westlake] *
9 [Steve Simpson] *
225 [Ronnie Lane's Slim Chance] *
4 [Gallagher and Lyle] *
25 [Ronnie Lane & Slim Chance] *
4 [Gallagher & Lyle] *
25 [Hughie Flint] *
36 [Tom McGuinness] *
1 [Dennis Coulson] *
1 [Lou Stonebridge]
)
= 1.80 x 10^33
Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
= 1 *
( 1.17 [McGuinness Flint] *
1 [Chris Stewart] *
1 [The Cramps] *
1 [Slim Chance] *
1 [Ronnie Lane] *
1 [Charlie Hart] *
1 [Brian Belshaw] *
1 [Bruce Rowland] *
1 [Colin Davey] *
1 [Drew McCulloch] *
1 [Graham Lyle] *
1 [Billy Livsey] *
1 [Jimmy Jewell] *
1 [Steve Bingham] *
1 [Ken Slaven] *
1 [Kevin Westlake] *
1 [Steve Simpson] *
1 [Ronnie Lane's Slim Chance] *
1 [Gallagher and Lyle] *
1 [Ronnie Lane & Slim Chance] *
1 [Gallagher & Lyle] *
1 [Hughie Flint] *
1 [Tom McGuinness] *
1 [Dennis Coulson] *
1 [Lou Stonebridge]
)
= 1.17
Outbound
6
Tags on post
Inbound
6
Posts tagging this
Connections
25
Total nodes
Base Node Strength
36
Base Node Influence
1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
1.65%
(1.80 × 1033 overall)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)The Cramps 49.84%Slim Chance 11.72%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
Connected Network Hierarchy
Sort list by:
Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)
