Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Gloomy GrimTommi LaunonenJuha Hintikka (2)Tanya KemppainenJanne OjalaJussi HeikkinenKim LappalainenMikko HuvinenLare Nieminen

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 6 hours ago
Comments: 0

jacierlogyn
Last login: 2 days ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Antti Selamaa

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Gloomy Grim

Connected Musicians

  • Janne Ojala
  • Juha Hintikka (2)
  • Jussi Heikkinen
  • Kim Lappalainen
  • Lare Nieminen
  • Mikko Huvinen
  • Tanya Kemppainen
  • Tomi Törnqvist
  • Tommi Launonen

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
0.56% of network
(3.24M)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (0.56%)
  • Tanya Kemppainen (5.00%)
  • Jussi Heikkinen (2.22%)
  • Kim Lappalainen (0.56%)
  • Janne Ojala (0.56%)
  • Lare Nieminen (0.56%)
  • Mikko Huvinen (0.56%)
  • Tomi Törnqvist (0.56%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Gloomy Grim 55.56%Tommi Launonen 20.00%Juha Hintikka (2) 13.89%
Influence Score
i
9.09% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (9.09%)
  • Kim Lappalainen (9.09%)
  • Juha Hintikka (2) (9.09%)
  • Tanya Kemppainen (9.09%)
  • Jussi Heikkinen (9.09%)
  • Tommi Launonen (9.09%)
  • Gloomy Grim (9.09%)
  • Janne Ojala (9.09%)
  • Lare Nieminen (9.09%)
  • Mikko Huvinen (9.09%)
  • Tomi Törnqvist (9.09%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 10 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Kim Lappalainen] *
                            25 [Juha Hintikka (2)] *
                            9 [Tanya Kemppainen] *
                            4 [Jussi Heikkinen] *
                            36 [Tommi Launonen] *
                            100 [Gloomy Grim] *
                            1 [Janne Ojala] *
                            1 [Lare Nieminen] *
                            1 [Mikko Huvinen] *
                            1 [Tomi Törnqvist]
                           )

                         = 3.24M

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Kim Lappalainen] *
                            1 [Juha Hintikka (2)] *
                            1 [Tanya Kemppainen] *
                            1 [Jussi Heikkinen] *
                            1 [Tommi Launonen] *
                            1 [Gloomy Grim] *
                            1 [Janne Ojala] *
                            1 [Lare Nieminen] *
                            1 [Mikko Huvinen] *
                            1 [Tomi Törnqvist]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 10 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
0.56% (3.24M overall)
  • This Post (0.56%)
  • Tanya Kemppainen (5.00%)
  • Jussi Heikkinen (2.22%)
  • Kim Lappalainen (0.56%)
  • Janne Ojala (0.56%)
  • Lare Nieminen (0.56%)
  • Mikko Huvinen (0.56%)
  • Tomi Törnqvist (0.56%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Gloomy Grim 55.56%Tommi Launonen 20.00%Juha Hintikka (2) 13.89%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
9.09% (1 overall)
  • This Post (9.09%)
  • Kim Lappalainen (9.09%)
  • Juha Hintikka (2) (9.09%)
  • Tanya Kemppainen (9.09%)
  • Jussi Heikkinen (9.09%)
  • Tommi Launonen (9.09%)
  • Gloomy Grim (9.09%)
  • Janne Ojala (9.09%)
  • Lare Nieminen (9.09%)
  • Mikko Huvinen (9.09%)
  • Tomi Törnqvist (9.09%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Kim Lappalainen ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Juha Hintikka (2) ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Tanya Kemppainen ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Jussi Heikkinen ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Tommi Launonen ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1
Gloomy Grim ↗
Str: 100Inf: 1
Janne Ojala ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Lare Nieminen ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Mikko Huvinen ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Tomi Törnqvist ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Tomi Törnqvist ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Mikko Huvinen ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Lare Nieminen ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Janne Ojala ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Gloomy Grim ↗
Str: 100Inf: 1
Tommi Launonen ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1
Jussi Heikkinen ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Tanya Kemppainen ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Juha Hintikka (2) ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Kim Lappalainen ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
Gloomy Grim
Inbound Posts (1)
Gloomy Grim
Last calculated: Jul 1, 1:13 AM
57

Related Content

No related content found.