Network Profile
View Network Math
Overall Strength
0.52%
of network20 )
Direct Connections
4
Node & Network Strength Details
×
How is this calculated? The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the website.
Every tag forms a network link. The pie charts below show each connected post's base strength (PV) and influence (IV) as a share of this post's direct neighbourhood.
Outbound
2
Tags on post
Inbound
2
Posts tagging this
Base Node Strength
4
Base Node Influence
1
Connected Nodes
17
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
0.52%
(1.06 × 1020 overall)
This Post (0.52%) Alessandro Pique (4.68%) Benny Aghassi (4.68%) Alayne Leslie (2.08%) Alexandra Bellamy (2.08%) Bart Aerbeydt (2.08%) Anne Katharina Schreiber (1.17%) Andreas Staier (1.17%) Alan Emslie (1.17%) Annelies Van Der Vegt (1.17%) Charlie Fischer (1.17%) Andrew Ackerman (0.52%) Anna Maya Luolajan Mikkola (0.52%) Anne Parisot (0.52%) Brian Dean (0.52%) Christa Kittel (0.52%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart) Freiburger Barockorchester 42.13% Friedemann Immer 33.29%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
This Post (5.56%) Freiburger Barockorchester (5.56%) Anne Katharina Schreiber (5.56%) Andreas Staier (5.56%) Friedemann Immer (5.56%) Alessandro Pique (5.56%) Alan Emslie (5.56%) Alayne Leslie (5.56%) Alexandra Bellamy (5.56%) Andrew Ackerman (5.56%) Anna Maya Luolajan Mikkola (5.56%) Anne Parisot (5.56%) Annelies Van Der Vegt (5.56%) Bart Aerbeydt (5.56%) Benny Aghassi (5.56%) Brian Dean (5.56%) Charlie Fischer (5.56%) Christa Kittel (5.56%)
Connected Network (How neighbours affect this node)
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)
Last calculated math cycle: May 4, 4:40 AM
Close Report
Analyzing Network Connections...
Most Relevant
Most Integral
Depth: 1 Level
Depth: 2 Levels
Depth: 3 Levels
Depth: 4 Levels
Depth: 5 Levels
Depth: 6 Levels
Depth: 7 Levels
👁️ 27 ViewsRelated Content No related content found.