How is this calculated?
The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.
// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1
// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1
// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 21 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
= 1 *
( 42 [Anonymous 4] *
483 [The Hilliard Ensemble] *
25 [David Cordier] *
1 [Adrian Hill] *
1 [Adrian Peacock] *
1 [Alison Gough] *
121 [Andrew Carwood] *
1 [Andrew Gant] *
1 [Andrew Murgatroyd] *
1 [Andrew Westwood] *
9 [Angus Smith] *
4 [Ashley Stafford] *
1 [Bruce Russell (2)] *
1 [Caroline Trevor] *
1 [Carys Lane] *
1 [Cecilia Osmond] *
36 [Charles Daniels (2)] *
4 [David Gould (5)] *
1 [David Martin (22)] *
4 [Deborah Miles Johnson] *
399 [The Tallis Scholars]
)
= 507.71T
Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
= 1 *
( 1.17 [Anonymous 4] *
1.1 [The Hilliard Ensemble] *
1 [David Cordier] *
1 [Adrian Hill] *
1 [Adrian Peacock] *
1 [Alison Gough] *
1 [Andrew Carwood] *
1 [Andrew Gant] *
1 [Andrew Murgatroyd] *
1 [Andrew Westwood] *
1 [Angus Smith] *
1 [Ashley Stafford] *
1 [Bruce Russell (2)] *
1 [Caroline Trevor] *
1 [Carys Lane] *
1 [Cecilia Osmond] *
1 [Charles Daniels (2)] *
1 [David Gould (5)] *
1 [David Martin (22)] *
1 [Deborah Miles Johnson] *
0.9048 [The Tallis Scholars]
)
= 1.16
Outbound
1
Tags on post
Inbound
1
Posts tagging this
Connections
21
Total nodes
Base Node Strength
1
Base Node Influence
1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)The Hilliard Ensemble 42.41%The Tallis Scholars 35.03%Andrew Carwood 10.62%Anonymous 4 3.69%Charles Daniels (2) 3.16%David Cordier 2.19%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
Connected Network Hierarchy
Sort list by:
Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)