Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Gil TaylorScott CarlsonChris Moore (7)Mike BeamsCol JonesMatt Harvey (2)Matt OlivoRepulsionDave HollingsheadMarissa Martinez-Hoadley

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 4 days ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Aaron Freeman (3)

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Repulsion

Connected Musicians

  • Chris Moore (7)
  • Col Jones
  • Dave Hollingshead
  • Marissa Martinez-Hoadley
  • Matt Harvey (2)
  • Matt Olivo
  • Mike Beams
  • Scott Carlson

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
0.52% of network
(5.37B)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (0.52%)
  • Matt Harvey (2) (18.56%)
  • Gil Taylor (10.31%)
  • Scott Carlson (8.25%)
  • Col Jones (4.64%)
  • Marissa Martinez-Hoadley (4.64%)
  • Mike Beams (2.06%)
  • Matt Olivo (2.06%)
  • Chris Moore (7) (2.06%)
  • Dave Hollingshead (0.52%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Repulsion 46.39%
Influence Score
i
8.97% of network
(1.13)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (8.97%)
  • Gil Taylor (11.21%)
  • Mike Beams (8.97%)
  • Col Jones (8.97%)
  • Scott Carlson (8.97%)
  • Matt Olivo (8.97%)
  • Chris Moore (7) (8.97%)
  • Dave Hollingshead (8.97%)
  • Marissa Martinez-Hoadley (8.97%)
  • Matt Harvey (2) (8.97%)
  • Repulsion (8.07%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 10 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 20 [Gil Taylor] *
                            4 [Mike Beams] *
                            9 [Col Jones] *
                            16 [Scott Carlson] *
                            4 [Matt Olivo] *
                            4 [Chris Moore (7)] *
                            1 [Dave Hollingshead] *
                            9 [Marissa Martinez-Hoadley] *
                            36 [Matt Harvey (2)] *
                            90 [Repulsion]
                           )

                         = 5.37B

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1.25 [Gil Taylor] *
                            1 [Mike Beams] *
                            1 [Col Jones] *
                            1 [Scott Carlson] *
                            1 [Matt Olivo] *
                            1 [Chris Moore (7)] *
                            1 [Dave Hollingshead] *
                            1 [Marissa Martinez-Hoadley] *
                            1 [Matt Harvey (2)] *
                            0.9 [Repulsion]
                           )

                         = 1.13
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 10 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
0.52% (5.37B overall)
  • This Post (0.52%)
  • Matt Harvey (2) (18.56%)
  • Gil Taylor (10.31%)
  • Scott Carlson (8.25%)
  • Col Jones (4.64%)
  • Marissa Martinez-Hoadley (4.64%)
  • Mike Beams (2.06%)
  • Matt Olivo (2.06%)
  • Chris Moore (7) (2.06%)
  • Dave Hollingshead (0.52%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Repulsion 46.39%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
8.97% (1.13 overall)
  • This Post (8.97%)
  • Gil Taylor (11.21%)
  • Mike Beams (8.97%)
  • Col Jones (8.97%)
  • Scott Carlson (8.97%)
  • Matt Olivo (8.97%)
  • Chris Moore (7) (8.97%)
  • Dave Hollingshead (8.97%)
  • Marissa Martinez-Hoadley (8.97%)
  • Matt Harvey (2) (8.97%)
  • Repulsion (8.07%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Gil Taylor ↗
Str: 20Inf: 1.25
Mike Beams ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Col Jones ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Scott Carlson ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Matt Olivo ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Chris Moore (7) ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Dave Hollingshead ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Marissa Martinez-Hoadley ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Matt Harvey (2) ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1
Repulsion ↗
Str: 90Inf: 0.9
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Repulsion ↗
Str: 90Inf: 0.9
Matt Harvey (2) ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1
Marissa Martinez-Hoadley ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Dave Hollingshead ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Chris Moore (7) ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Matt Olivo ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Scott Carlson ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Col Jones ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Mike Beams ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Gil Taylor ↗
Str: 20Inf: 1.25

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
Repulsion
Inbound Posts (1)
Repulsion
Last calculated: Jun 27, 8:56 AM
38

Related Content

Actors

  • Gil Taylor