How is this calculated?
The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.
// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 12) = 12
$outbound = max(1, 10) = 10
// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 12 * 10 = 120
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 12 / 10 = 1.2
// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 19 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
= 120 *
( 1 [Agriculture in Placer County, California] *
4 [Architecture of Placer County, California] *
1 [Foresthill Divide Museum] *
1 [Granite Chief Range] *
1 [Northstar California] *
4 [Placer County Big Trees Grove] *
1 [Sugar Pine Reservoir] *
81 [Tahoe National Forest] *
4 [Loomis, California] *
1 [Geology of Placer County, California] *
4 [Plumas County] *
36 [Yuba County] *
1 [Camp Robert L. Cole] *
1 [Donner Ski Ranch] *
1 [Downieville, California] *
1 [Mosquito Fire] *
1 [Sierra Buttes] *
1 [Architecture of Placer County] *
1 [Loomis]
)
= 89.58M
Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
= 1.2 *
( 1 [Agriculture in Placer County, California] *
1 [Architecture of Placer County, California] *
1 [Foresthill Divide Museum] *
1 [Granite Chief Range] *
1 [Northstar California] *
1 [Placer County Big Trees Grove] *
1 [Sugar Pine Reservoir] *
1 [Tahoe National Forest] *
1 [Loomis, California] *
1 [Geology of Placer County, California] *
1 [Plumas County] *
1 [Yuba County] *
1 [Camp Robert L. Cole] *
1 [Donner Ski Ranch] *
1 [Downieville, California] *
1 [Mosquito Fire] *
1 [Sierra Buttes] *
1 [Architecture of Placer County] *
1 [Loomis]
)
= 1.2
Outbound
12
Tags on post
Inbound
10
Posts tagging this
Connections
19
Total nodes
Base Node Strength
120
Base Node Influence
1.2
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)Tahoe National Forest 30.45%Yuba County 13.53%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
Connected Network Hierarchy
Sort list by:
Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)
Minerals of Placer County, California
BROKEN LINKPeople of Placer County, California
BROKEN LINK
