How is this calculated?
The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.
// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 18) = 18
$outbound = max(1, 18) = 18
// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 18 * 18 = 324
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 18 / 18 = 1
// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 44 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
= 324 *
( 56 [Les Misérables] *
1 [Mary Nash] *
324 [Hearts in Atlantis] *
64 [Anthony Hopkins] *
16 [Hitchcock] *
324 [The Silence of the Lambs] *
289 [Thor: Ragnarok] *
441 [Transformers: The Last Knight] *
256 [Thor: The Dark World] *
25 [The World's Fastest Indian] *
400 [Terminator Salvation] *
81 [Helena Bonham Carter] *
324 [Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street] *
400 [Fight Club] *
361 [Big Fish] *
441 [Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1] *
441 [Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2] *
4 [The King's Speech] *
324 [Foxcatcher] *
16 [Coriolanus] *
400 [Atonement] *
36 [Vanessa Redgrave] *
289 [Letters to Juliet] *
400 [Murder on the Orient Express] *
16 [Emma Thompson] *
4 [James Wilby] *
1 [Adrian Ross Magenty] *
1 [Ian Latimer] *
1 [Jemma Redgrave] *
1 [Jo Kendall] *
1 [Joseph Bennett] *
1 [Mark Tandy] *
1 [Nicola Duffett] *
4 [Prunella Scales] *
4 [Samuel West] *
1 [Andrew St. Clair] *
1 [Siegbert Prawer] *
1 [Susie Lindeman] *
400 [Gosford Park] *
16 [Sense and Sensibility] *
100 [Love Actually] *
16 [Saving Mr. Banks] *
1 [Fawlty Towers] *
1 [O/Modernt]
)
= 1.70 x 10^62
Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
= 1 *
( 1.14 [Les Misérables] *
1 [Mary Nash] *
1 [Hearts in Atlantis] *
1 [Anthony Hopkins] *
1 [Hitchcock] *
1 [The Silence of the Lambs] *
1 [Thor: Ragnarok] *
1 [Transformers: The Last Knight] *
1 [Thor: The Dark World] *
1 [The World's Fastest Indian] *
1 [Terminator Salvation] *
1 [Helena Bonham Carter] *
1 [Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street] *
1 [Fight Club] *
1 [Big Fish] *
1 [Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1] *
1 [Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2] *
1 [The King's Speech] *
1 [Foxcatcher] *
1 [Coriolanus] *
1 [Atonement] *
1 [Vanessa Redgrave] *
1 [Letters to Juliet] *
1 [Murder on the Orient Express] *
1 [Emma Thompson] *
1 [James Wilby] *
1 [Adrian Ross Magenty] *
1 [Ian Latimer] *
1 [Jemma Redgrave] *
1 [Jo Kendall] *
1 [Joseph Bennett] *
1 [Mark Tandy] *
1 [Nicola Duffett] *
1 [Prunella Scales] *
1 [Samuel West] *
1 [Andrew St. Clair] *
1 [Siegbert Prawer] *
1 [Susie Lindeman] *
1 [Gosford Park] *
1 [Sense and Sensibility] *
1 [Love Actually] *
1 [Saving Mr. Banks] *
1 [Fawlty Towers] *
1 [O/Modernt]
)
= 1.14
Outbound
18
Tags on post
Inbound
18
Posts tagging this
Connections
44
Total nodes
Base Node Strength
324
Base Node Influence
1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
4.90%
(1.70 × 1062 overall)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)Transformers: The Last Knight 6.67%Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1 6.67%Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2 6.67%Terminator Salvation 6.05%Fight Club 6.05%Atonement 6.05%Murder on the Orient Express 6.05%Gosford Park 6.05%Big Fish 5.46%Hearts in Atlantis 4.90%The Silence of the Lambs 4.90%Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street 4.90%Foxcatcher 4.90%Thor: Ragnarok 4.37%Letters to Juliet 4.37%Thor: The Dark World 3.87%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
Connected Network Hierarchy
Sort list by:
Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)