Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Play Misty for MeJames McEachinDan FrazerIt Takes a ThiefDeconstructing HarryTick, Tick, TickEvery Which Way But Loose2010: The Year We Make Contact

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Eileen Lally
Last login: 3 days ago
Comments: 0

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 7 days ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Fuzz

Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook
Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
0.50% of network
(1.7T)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (0.50%)
  • Every Which Way But Loose (4.46%)
  • James McEachin (3.09%)
  • Dan Frazer (1.49%)
  • Play Misty for Me (1.11%)
  • 2010: The Year We Make Contact (1.11%)
  • Tick, Tick, Tick (0.50%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Deconstructing Harry 51.98%It Takes a Thief 35.77%
Influence Score
i
10.77% of network
(1.27)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (10.77%)
  • Dan Frazer (14.36%)
  • It Takes a Thief (10.77%)
  • James McEachin (10.77%)
  • Every Which Way But Loose (10.77%)
  • Play Misty for Me (10.77%)
  • 2010: The Year We Make Contact (10.77%)
  • Tick, Tick, Tick (10.77%)
  • Deconstructing Harry (10.26%)
Direct Connections 4

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 2) = 2
$outbound = max(1, 2) = 2

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 2 * 2 = 4
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 2 / 2 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 8 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 4 *
                           ( 12 [Dan Frazer] *
                            289 [It Takes a Thief] *
                            25 [James McEachin] *
                            36 [Every Which Way But Loose] *
                            9 [Play Misty for Me] *
                            9 [2010: The Year We Make Contact] *
                            4 [Tick, Tick, Tick] *
                            420 [Deconstructing Harry]
                           )
                         = 1.7T

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1.33 [Dan Frazer] *
                            1 [It Takes a Thief] *
                            1 [James McEachin] *
                            1 [Every Which Way But Loose] *
                            1 [Play Misty for Me] *
                            1 [2010: The Year We Make Contact] *
                            1 [Tick, Tick, Tick] *
                            0.9524 [Deconstructing Harry]
                           )
                         = 1.27
Outbound 2 Tags on post
Inbound 2 Posts tagging this
Connections 8 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 4
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
0.50% (1.7T overall)
  • This Post (0.50%)
  • Every Which Way But Loose (4.46%)
  • James McEachin (3.09%)
  • Dan Frazer (1.49%)
  • Play Misty for Me (1.11%)
  • 2010: The Year We Make Contact (1.11%)
  • Tick, Tick, Tick (0.50%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Deconstructing Harry 51.98%It Takes a Thief 35.77%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
10.77% (1.27 overall)
  • This Post (10.77%)
  • Dan Frazer (14.36%)
  • It Takes a Thief (10.77%)
  • James McEachin (10.77%)
  • Every Which Way But Loose (10.77%)
  • Play Misty for Me (10.77%)
  • 2010: The Year We Make Contact (10.77%)
  • Tick, Tick, Tick (10.77%)
  • Deconstructing Harry (10.26%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Dan Frazer ↗
Str: 12Inf: 1.33
It Takes a Thief ↗
Str: 289Inf: 1
James McEachin ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Every Which Way But Loose ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1
Play Misty for Me ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
2010: The Year We Make Contact ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Tick, Tick, Tick ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Deconstructing Harry ↗
Str: 420Inf: 0.9524
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Deconstructing Harry ↗
Str: 420Inf: 0.9524
Tick, Tick, Tick ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
2010: The Year We Make Contact ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Play Misty for Me ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Every Which Way But Loose ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1
James McEachin ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
It Takes a Thief ↗
Str: 289Inf: 1
Dan Frazer ↗
Str: 12Inf: 1.33

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (2)
Dan Frazer
James McEachin
Inbound Posts (2)
James McEachin
Dan Frazer
Last calculated: Jun 9, 1:25 AM
20

Related Content

Actors

  • Tick, Tick, Tick
  • James McEachin
  • Dan Frazer

Films

  • Deconstructing Harry
  • It Takes a Thief
  • Every Which Way But Loose
  • Play Misty for Me
  • 2010: The Year We Make Contact