Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

John Coast
Miguel Covarrubias
Colin McPhee
Sergei Rachmaninov
Walter Spies Paintings of Bali
jane Belo
Gregor Krause
Yogyakarta Sultanate
Walter Spies 1895
leo spies

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 13 hours ago
Comments: 0

Darragh Lennon
Last login: 1 day ago
Comments: 0

Cathal Kennedy
Last login: 1 week ago
Comments: 0

jacierlogyn
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Hamengkubuwono VII

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Musicians

  • leo spies
    leo spies band photo

Related Videos

Walter Spies Paintings of Bali

Walter Spies Paintings of Bali

Walter Spies Paintings of Bali

Anatomy of an Artwork: Walter Spies' Magical Fable in Bali

Anatomy of an Artwork: Walter Spies' Magical Fable in Bali

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
0.44% of network
(2.08 × 1017)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (0.44%)
  • Walter Spies 1895 (15.70%)
  • Yogyakarta Sultanate (5.34%)
  • Sergei Rachmaninov (4.58%)
  • Gregor Krause (3.93%)
  • Hamengkubuwono IX (1.74%)
  • Dutch Intervention 1906 (0.98%)
  • hamengkubuwono VIII (0.98%)
  • Miguel Covarrubias (0.44%)
  • jane Belo (0.44%)
  • Siam-Burma railroad (0.33%)
  • leo spies (0.11%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
John Coast 43.62%Colin McPhee 21.37%
Influence Score
i
6.19% of network
(3.5)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (6.19%)
  • Siam-Burma railroad (18.56%)
  • Sergei Rachmaninov (7.22%)
  • Colin McPhee (6.19%)
  • John Coast (6.19%)
  • Dutch Intervention 1906 (6.19%)
  • Walter Spies 1895 (6.19%)
  • Gregor Krause (6.19%)
  • Miguel Covarrubias (6.19%)
  • jane Belo (6.19%)
  • hamengkubuwono VIII (6.19%)
  • leo spies (6.19%)
  • Yogyakarta Sultanate (6.19%)
  • Hamengkubuwono IX (6.19%)
Direct Connections 4

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 2) = 2
$outbound = max(1, 2) = 2

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 2 * 2 = 4
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 2 / 2 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 13 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 4 *
                           ( 3 [Siam-Burma railroad] *
                            42 [Sergei Rachmaninov] *
                            196 [Colin McPhee] *
                            400 [John Coast] *
                            9 [Dutch Intervention 1906] *
                            144 [Walter Spies 1895] *
                            36 [Gregor Krause] *
                            4 [Miguel Covarrubias] *
                            4 [jane Belo] *
                            9 [hamengkubuwono VIII] *
                            1 [leo spies] *
                            49 [Yogyakarta Sultanate] *
                            16 [Hamengkubuwono IX]
                           )

                         = 2.08 x 10^17

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 3 [Siam-Burma railroad] *
                            1.17 [Sergei Rachmaninov] *
                            1 [Colin McPhee] *
                            1 [John Coast] *
                            1 [Dutch Intervention 1906] *
                            1 [Walter Spies 1895] *
                            1 [Gregor Krause] *
                            1 [Miguel Covarrubias] *
                            1 [jane Belo] *
                            1 [hamengkubuwono VIII] *
                            1 [leo spies] *
                            1 [Yogyakarta Sultanate] *
                            1 [Hamengkubuwono IX]
                           )

                         = 3.5
Outbound 2 Tags on post
Inbound 2 Posts tagging this
Connections 13 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 4
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
0.44% (2.08 × 1017 overall)
  • This Post (0.44%)
  • Walter Spies 1895 (15.70%)
  • Yogyakarta Sultanate (5.34%)
  • Sergei Rachmaninov (4.58%)
  • Gregor Krause (3.93%)
  • Hamengkubuwono IX (1.74%)
  • Dutch Intervention 1906 (0.98%)
  • hamengkubuwono VIII (0.98%)
  • Miguel Covarrubias (0.44%)
  • jane Belo (0.44%)
  • Siam-Burma railroad (0.33%)
  • leo spies (0.11%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
John Coast 43.62%Colin McPhee 21.37%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
6.19% (3.5 overall)
  • This Post (6.19%)
  • Siam-Burma railroad (18.56%)
  • Sergei Rachmaninov (7.22%)
  • Colin McPhee (6.19%)
  • John Coast (6.19%)
  • Dutch Intervention 1906 (6.19%)
  • Walter Spies 1895 (6.19%)
  • Gregor Krause (6.19%)
  • Miguel Covarrubias (6.19%)
  • jane Belo (6.19%)
  • hamengkubuwono VIII (6.19%)
  • leo spies (6.19%)
  • Yogyakarta Sultanate (6.19%)
  • Hamengkubuwono IX (6.19%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Siam-Burma railroad ↗
Str: 3Inf: 3
Sergei Rachmaninov ↗
Str: 42Inf: 1.17
Colin McPhee ↗
Str: 196Inf: 1
John Coast ↗
Str: 400Inf: 1
Dutch Intervention 1906 ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Walter Spies 1895 ↗
Str: 144Inf: 1
Gregor Krause ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1
Miguel Covarrubias ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
jane Belo ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
hamengkubuwono VIII ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
leo spies ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Yogyakarta Sultanate ↗
Str: 49Inf: 1
Hamengkubuwono IX ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Hamengkubuwono IX ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Yogyakarta Sultanate ↗
Str: 49Inf: 1
leo spies ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
hamengkubuwono VIII ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
jane Belo ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Miguel Covarrubias ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Gregor Krause ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1
Walter Spies 1895 ↗
Str: 144Inf: 1
Dutch Intervention 1906 ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
John Coast ↗
Str: 400Inf: 1
Colin McPhee ↗
Str: 196Inf: 1
Sergei Rachmaninov ↗
Str: 42Inf: 1.17
Siam-Burma railroad ↗
Str: 3Inf: 3

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (2)
hamengkubuwono VIII
Walter Spies 1895
Inbound Posts (2)
Walter Spies 1895
hamengkubuwono VIII
Last calculated: Jul 23, 5:17 AM
41

Related Content

Composers

  • Sergei Rachmaninov
  • Colin McPhee

Figures

  • hamengkubuwono VIII
  • John Coast
  • Hamengkubuwono IX
  • Walter Spies 1895
  • Gregor Krause
  • Miguel Covarrubias
  • jane Belo

Locations

  • Siam-Burma railroad

Organisations

  • Yogyakarta Sultanate

Subjects

  • Dutch Intervention 1906