Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Gilles Binchois
Francesco LandiniGuillaume de MachautJohan of FécampArs nova (1310–1377)

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 1 hour ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 2 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Giovanni da Firenze

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
1.39% of network
(2.1K)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (1.39%)
  • Francesco Landini (2.78%)
  • Guillaume de Machaut (1.39%)
  • Johan of Fécamp (1.39%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Gilles Binchois 58.33%Ars nova (1310–1377) 34.72%
Influence Score
i
18.67% of network
(0.4286)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (18.67%)
  • Guillaume de Machaut (18.67%)
  • Johan of Fécamp (18.67%)
  • Ars nova (1310–1377) (18.67%)
  • Gilles Binchois (16.00%)
  • Francesco Landini (9.33%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 5 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Guillaume de Machaut] *
                            1 [Johan of Fécamp] *
                            25 [Ars nova (1310–1377)] *
                            42 [Gilles Binchois] *
                            2 [Francesco Landini]
                           )

                         = 2.1K

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Guillaume de Machaut] *
                            1 [Johan of Fécamp] *
                            1 [Ars nova (1310–1377)] *
                            0.8571 [Gilles Binchois] *
                            0.5 [Francesco Landini]
                           )

                         = 0.4286
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 5 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
1.39% (2.1K overall)
  • This Post (1.39%)
  • Francesco Landini (2.78%)
  • Guillaume de Machaut (1.39%)
  • Johan of Fécamp (1.39%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Gilles Binchois 58.33%Ars nova (1310–1377) 34.72%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
18.67% (0.4286 overall)
  • This Post (18.67%)
  • Guillaume de Machaut (18.67%)
  • Johan of Fécamp (18.67%)
  • Ars nova (1310–1377) (18.67%)
  • Gilles Binchois (16.00%)
  • Francesco Landini (9.33%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Guillaume de Machaut ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Johan of Fécamp ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Ars nova (1310–1377) ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Gilles Binchois ↗
Str: 42Inf: 0.8571
Francesco Landini ↗
Str: 2Inf: 0.5
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Francesco Landini ↗
Str: 2Inf: 0.5
Gilles Binchois ↗
Str: 42Inf: 0.8571
Ars nova (1310–1377) ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Johan of Fécamp ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Guillaume de Machaut ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
Ars nova (1310–1377)
Inbound Posts (1)
Ars nova (1310–1377)
Last calculated: Jun 22, 6:30 PM
37

Related Content

Composers

  • Guillaume de Machaut
  • Gilles Binchois
  • Francesco Landini

Subtopics

  • Ars nova (1310–1377)

Topics

  • Johan of Fécamp