Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Williamstown
Williams CollegeHarry Augustus GarfieldHenry Eugene DaviesWilliams College Museum of ArtRichard Austin RiceHenry Loomis NelsonPaul A. Chadbourne

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 1 day ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 1 week ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Edward Dorr Griffin

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Related Images

Williams College athletics

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
0.74% of network
(145.2K)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (0.74%)
  • Williams College Museum of Art (8.89%)
  • Henry Loomis Nelson (2.96%)
  • Harry Augustus Garfield (0.74%)
  • Henry Eugene Davies (0.74%)
  • Paul A. Chadbourne (0.74%)
  • Richard Austin Rice (0.74%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Williams College 53.33%Williamstown 31.11%
Influence Score
i
10.39% of network
(1.75)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (10.39%)
  • Williams College Museum of Art (13.85%)
  • Williamstown (12.12%)
  • Williams College (11.69%)
  • Harry Augustus Garfield (10.39%)
  • Henry Eugene Davies (10.39%)
  • Henry Loomis Nelson (10.39%)
  • Paul A. Chadbourne (10.39%)
  • Richard Austin Rice (10.39%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 8 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 12 [Williams College Museum of Art] *
                            42 [Williamstown] *
                            72 [Williams College] *
                            1 [Harry Augustus Garfield] *
                            1 [Henry Eugene Davies] *
                            4 [Henry Loomis Nelson] *
                            1 [Paul A. Chadbourne] *
                            1 [Richard Austin Rice]
                           )

                         = 145.2K

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1.33 [Williams College Museum of Art] *
                            1.17 [Williamstown] *
                            1.13 [Williams College] *
                            1 [Harry Augustus Garfield] *
                            1 [Henry Eugene Davies] *
                            1 [Henry Loomis Nelson] *
                            1 [Paul A. Chadbourne] *
                            1 [Richard Austin Rice]
                           )

                         = 1.75
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 8 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
0.74% (145.2K overall)
  • This Post (0.74%)
  • Williams College Museum of Art (8.89%)
  • Henry Loomis Nelson (2.96%)
  • Harry Augustus Garfield (0.74%)
  • Henry Eugene Davies (0.74%)
  • Paul A. Chadbourne (0.74%)
  • Richard Austin Rice (0.74%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Williams College 53.33%Williamstown 31.11%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
10.39% (1.75 overall)
  • This Post (10.39%)
  • Williams College Museum of Art (13.85%)
  • Williamstown (12.12%)
  • Williams College (11.69%)
  • Harry Augustus Garfield (10.39%)
  • Henry Eugene Davies (10.39%)
  • Henry Loomis Nelson (10.39%)
  • Paul A. Chadbourne (10.39%)
  • Richard Austin Rice (10.39%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Williams College Museum of Art ↗
Str: 12Inf: 1.33
Williamstown ↗
Str: 42Inf: 1.17
Williams College ↗
Str: 72Inf: 1.13
Harry Augustus Garfield ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Henry Eugene Davies ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Henry Loomis Nelson ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Paul A. Chadbourne ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Richard Austin Rice ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Richard Austin Rice ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Paul A. Chadbourne ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Henry Loomis Nelson ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Henry Eugene Davies ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Harry Augustus Garfield ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Williams College ↗
Str: 72Inf: 1.13
Williamstown ↗
Str: 42Inf: 1.17
Williams College Museum of Art ↗
Str: 12Inf: 1.33

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
Williams College
Inbound Posts (1)
Williams College
Last calculated: Jun 16, 11:02 PM
26

Related Content

Figures

  • Harry Augustus Garfield
  • Henry Eugene Davies
  • Henry Loomis Nelson
  • Richard Austin Rice

Locations

  • Williamstown
  • Williams College
  • Williams College Museum of Art

Topics

  • Paul A. Chadbourne