Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

John Edward PigotWilliam FordeNational Gallery of IrelandThomas Davis
Thomas Carlyle
David Richard PigotJane Carlyle

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 2 hours ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 2 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Charles Gavan Duffy

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Related Images

1822

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
0.92% of network
(14.4K)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (0.92%)
  • National Gallery of Ireland (5.50%)
  • Thomas Davis (0.92%)
  • Thomas Carlyle (0.92%)
  • Jane Carlyle (0.92%)
  • David Richard Pigot (0.92%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
John Edward Pigot 44.95%William Forde 44.95%
Influence Score
i
11.76% of network
(1.5)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (11.76%)
  • National Gallery of Ireland (17.65%)
  • John Edward Pigot (11.76%)
  • William Forde (11.76%)
  • Thomas Davis (11.76%)
  • Thomas Carlyle (11.76%)
  • Jane Carlyle (11.76%)
  • David Richard Pigot (11.76%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 7 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 6 [National Gallery of Ireland] *
                            49 [John Edward Pigot] *
                            49 [William Forde] *
                            1 [Thomas Davis] *
                            1 [Thomas Carlyle] *
                            1 [Jane Carlyle] *
                            1 [David Richard Pigot]
                           )

                         = 14.4K

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1.5 [National Gallery of Ireland] *
                            1 [John Edward Pigot] *
                            1 [William Forde] *
                            1 [Thomas Davis] *
                            1 [Thomas Carlyle] *
                            1 [Jane Carlyle] *
                            1 [David Richard Pigot]
                           )

                         = 1.5
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 7 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
0.92% (14.4K overall)
  • This Post (0.92%)
  • National Gallery of Ireland (5.50%)
  • Thomas Davis (0.92%)
  • Thomas Carlyle (0.92%)
  • Jane Carlyle (0.92%)
  • David Richard Pigot (0.92%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
John Edward Pigot 44.95%William Forde 44.95%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
11.76% (1.5 overall)
  • This Post (11.76%)
  • National Gallery of Ireland (17.65%)
  • John Edward Pigot (11.76%)
  • William Forde (11.76%)
  • Thomas Davis (11.76%)
  • Thomas Carlyle (11.76%)
  • Jane Carlyle (11.76%)
  • David Richard Pigot (11.76%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
National Gallery of Ireland ↗
Str: 6Inf: 1.5
John Edward Pigot ↗
Str: 49Inf: 1
William Forde ↗
Str: 49Inf: 1
Thomas Davis ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Thomas Carlyle ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Jane Carlyle ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
David Richard Pigot ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
David Richard Pigot ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Jane Carlyle ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Thomas Carlyle ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Thomas Davis ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
William Forde ↗
Str: 49Inf: 1
John Edward Pigot ↗
Str: 49Inf: 1
National Gallery of Ireland ↗
Str: 6Inf: 1.5

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
John Edward Pigot
Inbound Posts (1)
John Edward Pigot
Last calculated: Jun 20, 6:23 PM
32

Related Content

Figures

  • David Richard Pigot
  • John Edward Pigot
  • William Forde
  • Thomas Davis
  • Thomas Carlyle
  • Jane Carlyle

Venues

  • National Gallery of Ireland