Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Théodore Canillé
Sergei Rachmaninov
Pyotr Il’yich Tchaikovsky
Nikolai Rimsky Korsakov
Walter Spies 1895
Modest MussorgskyJohn FieldCésar Cui

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 2 days ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 6 days ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Mily Balakirev

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Related Images

1837

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
1.09% of network
(3.39T)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (1.09%)
  • Walter Spies 1895 (39.24%)
  • Nikolai Rimsky Korsakov (22.07%)
  • Sergei Rachmaninov (11.44%)
  • Pyotr Il'yich Tchaikovsky (8.17%)
  • John Field (6.81%)
  • Modest Mussorgsky (4.36%)
  • César Cui (4.36%)
  • Théodore Canillé (2.45%)
Influence Score
i
11.11% of network
(0.9722)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (11.11%)
  • Sergei Rachmaninov (12.96%)
  • Nikolai Rimsky Korsakov (11.11%)
  • Modest Mussorgsky (11.11%)
  • John Field (11.11%)
  • Walter Spies 1895 (11.11%)
  • Théodore Canillé (11.11%)
  • César Cui (11.11%)
  • Pyotr Il'yich Tchaikovsky (9.26%)
Direct Connections 4

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 2) = 2
$outbound = max(1, 2) = 2

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 2 * 2 = 4
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 2 / 2 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 8 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 4 *
                           ( 42 [Sergei Rachmaninov] *
                            81 [Nikolai Rimsky Korsakov] *
                            16 [Modest Mussorgsky] *
                            25 [John Field] *
                            144 [Walter Spies 1895] *
                            9 [Théodore Canillé] *
                            16 [César Cui] *
                            30 [Pyotr Il'yich Tchaikovsky]
                           )

                         = 3.39T

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1.17 [Sergei Rachmaninov] *
                            1 [Nikolai Rimsky Korsakov] *
                            1 [Modest Mussorgsky] *
                            1 [John Field] *
                            1 [Walter Spies 1895] *
                            1 [Théodore Canillé] *
                            1 [César Cui] *
                            0.8333 [Pyotr Il'yich Tchaikovsky]
                           )

                         = 0.9722
Outbound 2 Tags on post
Inbound 2 Posts tagging this
Connections 8 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 4
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
1.09% (3.39T overall)
  • This Post (1.09%)
  • Walter Spies 1895 (39.24%)
  • Nikolai Rimsky Korsakov (22.07%)
  • Sergei Rachmaninov (11.44%)
  • Pyotr Il'yich Tchaikovsky (8.17%)
  • John Field (6.81%)
  • Modest Mussorgsky (4.36%)
  • César Cui (4.36%)
  • Théodore Canillé (2.45%)
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
11.11% (0.9722 overall)
  • This Post (11.11%)
  • Sergei Rachmaninov (12.96%)
  • Nikolai Rimsky Korsakov (11.11%)
  • Modest Mussorgsky (11.11%)
  • John Field (11.11%)
  • Walter Spies 1895 (11.11%)
  • Théodore Canillé (11.11%)
  • César Cui (11.11%)
  • Pyotr Il'yich Tchaikovsky (9.26%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Sergei Rachmaninov ↗
Str: 42Inf: 1.17
Nikolai Rimsky Korsakov ↗
Str: 81Inf: 1
Modest Mussorgsky ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
John Field ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Walter Spies 1895 ↗
Str: 144Inf: 1
Théodore Canillé ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
César Cui ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Pyotr Il'yich Tchaikovsky ↗
Str: 30Inf: 0.8333
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Pyotr Il'yich Tchaikovsky ↗
Str: 30Inf: 0.8333
César Cui ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Théodore Canillé ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Walter Spies 1895 ↗
Str: 144Inf: 1
John Field ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Modest Mussorgsky ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Nikolai Rimsky Korsakov ↗
Str: 81Inf: 1
Sergei Rachmaninov ↗
Str: 42Inf: 1.17

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (2)
Sergei Rachmaninov
Théodore Canillé
Inbound Posts (2)
Sergei Rachmaninov
Théodore Canillé
Last calculated: Jun 12, 7:28 PM
44

Related Content

Composers

  • John Field
  • Théodore Canillé
  • César Cui
  • Nikolai Rimsky Korsakov
  • Sergei Rachmaninov
  • Pyotr Il’yich Tchaikovsky
  • Modest Mussorgsky

Figures

  • Walter Spies 1895