Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Richard Strauss
Conservatoire de Paris
Claude Debussy
Igor Stravinsky
ravi shankar
Maurice Ravel
Louis Diémer
Alfredo Casella
Gustav Mahler
Yehudi Menuhin

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 1 day ago
Comments: 0

Darragh Lennon
Last login: 2 days ago
Comments: 0

Cathal Kennedy
Last login: 1 week ago
Comments: 0

jacierlogyn
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

George Enescu

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Related Images

Lazare-Lévy
Introduzione-Largo-e-solenne
1881
1883
FGMenhuin

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Bath Festival Orchestra

Connected Musicians

  • Louis Diémer
    Louis Diémer band photo

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
0.21% of network
(1.18 × 1020)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (0.21%)
  • Alfredo Casella (6.31%)
  • ravi shankar (5.63%)
  • Richard Strauss (3.34%)
  • Claude Debussy (2.55%)
  • Maurice Ravel (2.19%)
  • Gustav Mahler (2.19%)
  • Igor Stravinsky (1.88%)
  • Louis Diémer (1.30%)
  • Yehudi Menuhin (0.47%)
  • Gabriel Fauré (0.47%)
  • Bath Festival Orchestra (0.21%)
  • Ferruccio Busoni (0.05%)
  • Conservatorio Santa Cecilia (0.05%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Conservatoire de Paris 73.16%
Influence Score
i
6.73% of network
(0.8125)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (6.73%)
  • Gustav Mahler (7.85%)
  • Conservatoire de Paris (7.29%)
  • Alfredo Casella (6.73%)
  • Yehudi Menuhin (6.73%)
  • Richard Strauss (6.73%)
  • Igor Stravinsky (6.73%)
  • Gabriel Fauré (6.73%)
  • Ferruccio Busoni (6.73%)
  • Claude Debussy (6.73%)
  • Louis Diémer (6.73%)
  • Conservatorio Santa Cecilia (6.73%)
  • Bath Festival Orchestra (6.73%)
  • Maurice Ravel (5.77%)
  • ravi shankar (5.05%)
Direct Connections 4

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 2) = 2
$outbound = max(1, 2) = 2

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 2 * 2 = 4
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 2 / 2 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 14 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 4 *
                           ( 42 [Gustav Mahler] *
                            1.4K [Conservatoire de Paris] *
                            121 [Alfredo Casella] *
                            9 [Yehudi Menuhin] *
                            64 [Richard Strauss] *
                            36 [Igor Stravinsky] *
                            9 [Gabriel Fauré] *
                            1 [Ferruccio Busoni] *
                            49 [Claude Debussy] *
                            25 [Louis Diémer] *
                            1 [Conservatorio Santa Cecilia] *
                            4 [Bath Festival Orchestra] *
                            42 [Maurice Ravel] *
                            108 [ravi shankar]
                           )

                         = 1.18 x 10^20

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1.17 [Gustav Mahler] *
                            1.08 [Conservatoire de Paris] *
                            1 [Alfredo Casella] *
                            1 [Yehudi Menuhin] *
                            1 [Richard Strauss] *
                            1 [Igor Stravinsky] *
                            1 [Gabriel Fauré] *
                            1 [Ferruccio Busoni] *
                            1 [Claude Debussy] *
                            1 [Louis Diémer] *
                            1 [Conservatorio Santa Cecilia] *
                            1 [Bath Festival Orchestra] *
                            0.8571 [Maurice Ravel] *
                            0.75 [ravi shankar]
                           )

                         = 0.8125
Outbound 2 Tags on post
Inbound 2 Posts tagging this
Connections 14 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 4
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
0.21% (1.18 × 1020 overall)
  • This Post (0.21%)
  • Alfredo Casella (6.31%)
  • ravi shankar (5.63%)
  • Richard Strauss (3.34%)
  • Claude Debussy (2.55%)
  • Maurice Ravel (2.19%)
  • Gustav Mahler (2.19%)
  • Igor Stravinsky (1.88%)
  • Louis Diémer (1.30%)
  • Yehudi Menuhin (0.47%)
  • Gabriel Fauré (0.47%)
  • Bath Festival Orchestra (0.21%)
  • Ferruccio Busoni (0.05%)
  • Conservatorio Santa Cecilia (0.05%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Conservatoire de Paris 73.16%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
6.73% (0.8125 overall)
  • This Post (6.73%)
  • Gustav Mahler (7.85%)
  • Conservatoire de Paris (7.29%)
  • Alfredo Casella (6.73%)
  • Yehudi Menuhin (6.73%)
  • Richard Strauss (6.73%)
  • Igor Stravinsky (6.73%)
  • Gabriel Fauré (6.73%)
  • Ferruccio Busoni (6.73%)
  • Claude Debussy (6.73%)
  • Louis Diémer (6.73%)
  • Conservatorio Santa Cecilia (6.73%)
  • Bath Festival Orchestra (6.73%)
  • Maurice Ravel (5.77%)
  • ravi shankar (5.05%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Gustav Mahler ↗
Str: 42Inf: 1.17
Conservatoire de Paris ↗
Str: 1.4KInf: 1.08
Alfredo Casella ↗
Str: 121Inf: 1
Yehudi Menuhin ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Richard Strauss ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1
Igor Stravinsky ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1
Gabriel Fauré ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Ferruccio Busoni ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Claude Debussy ↗
Str: 49Inf: 1
Louis Diémer ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Conservatorio Santa Cecilia ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Bath Festival Orchestra ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Maurice Ravel ↗
Str: 42Inf: 0.8571
ravi shankar ↗
Str: 108Inf: 0.75
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
ravi shankar ↗
Str: 108Inf: 0.75
Maurice Ravel ↗
Str: 42Inf: 0.8571
Bath Festival Orchestra ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Conservatorio Santa Cecilia ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Louis Diémer ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Claude Debussy ↗
Str: 49Inf: 1
Ferruccio Busoni ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Gabriel Fauré ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Igor Stravinsky ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1
Richard Strauss ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1
Yehudi Menuhin ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Alfredo Casella ↗
Str: 121Inf: 1
Conservatoire de Paris ↗
Str: 1.4KInf: 1.08
Gustav Mahler ↗
Str: 42Inf: 1.17

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (2)
Alfredo Casella
Yehudi Menuhin
Inbound Posts (2)
Alfredo Casella
Yehudi Menuhin
Last calculated: Jul 23, 5:04 PM
68

Related Content

Composers

  • Igor Stravinsky
  • Gustav Mahler
  • Gabriel Fauré
  • Ferruccio Busoni
  • Alfredo Casella
  • Claude Debussy
  • Yehudi Menuhin
  • Richard Strauss
  • Conservatorio Santa Cecilia
  • Maurice Ravel
  • ravi shankar

Locations

  • Conservatoire de Paris