Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Etc EtcPaul MaxwellTearjerkersPaul Maxwell (2)ProtexThe Incredibly Boring BandHoward Ingram (2)Brian RawsonDetonatorsElectrical detonators

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 5 days ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

the tearjerkers

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Related Images

605288940_1317477033515974_7557981176632703143_n.jpg

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Etc Etc
  • Protex
  • The Incredibly Boring Band

Connected Musicians

  • Brian Rawson
  • Howard Ingram (2)
  • Nigel Hamilton
  • Paul Maxwell
  • Paul Maxwell (2)
  • Paul McIlwaine
  • Tearjerkers

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
21.29% of network
(28.32T)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (21.29%)
  • Detonators (11.41%)
  • The Incredibly Boring Band (9.51%)
  • Etc Etc (7.60%)
  • Paul Maxwell (6.08%)
  • Paul McIlwaine (1.52%)
  • Blasting machines (1.52%)
  • Electrical detonators (1.52%)
  • Military detonators (1.52%)
  • Railway detonators (1.52%)
  • Tearjerkers (0.38%)
  • Brian Rawson (0.38%)
  • Howard Ingram (2) (0.38%)
  • Paul Maxwell (2) (0.38%)
  • Nigel Hamilton (0.38%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Protex 18.63%Howard Ingram 15.97%
Influence Score
i
6.69% of network
(1.02)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (6.69%)
  • Etc Etc (7.32%)
  • Paul Maxwell (5.85%)
  • Tearjerkers (5.85%)
  • Brian Rawson (5.85%)
  • Howard Ingram (2) (5.85%)
  • Paul Maxwell (2) (5.85%)
  • Paul McIlwaine (5.85%)
  • Nigel Hamilton (5.85%)
  • Protex (5.85%)
  • The Incredibly Boring Band (5.85%)
  • Blasting machines (5.85%)
  • Electrical detonators (5.85%)
  • Military detonators (5.85%)
  • Railway detonators (5.85%)
  • Howard Ingram (5.02%)
  • Detonators (4.88%)
Direct Connections 15

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 8) = 8
$outbound = max(1, 7) = 7

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 8 * 7 = 56
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 8 / 7 = 1.1429

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 16 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 56 *
                           ( 20 [Etc Etc] *
                            16 [Paul Maxwell] *
                            1 [Tearjerkers] *
                            1 [Brian Rawson] *
                            1 [Howard Ingram (2)] *
                            1 [Paul Maxwell (2)] *
                            4 [Paul McIlwaine] *
                            1 [Nigel Hamilton] *
                            49 [Protex] *
                            25 [The Incredibly Boring Band] *
                            4 [Blasting machines] *
                            4 [Electrical detonators] *
                            4 [Military detonators] *
                            4 [Railway detonators] *
                            42 [Howard Ingram] *
                            30 [Detonators]
                           )

                         = 28.32T

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1.1429 *
                           ( 1.25 [Etc Etc] *
                            1 [Paul Maxwell] *
                            1 [Tearjerkers] *
                            1 [Brian Rawson] *
                            1 [Howard Ingram (2)] *
                            1 [Paul Maxwell (2)] *
                            1 [Paul McIlwaine] *
                            1 [Nigel Hamilton] *
                            1 [Protex] *
                            1 [The Incredibly Boring Band] *
                            1 [Blasting machines] *
                            1 [Electrical detonators] *
                            1 [Military detonators] *
                            1 [Railway detonators] *
                            0.8571 [Howard Ingram] *
                            0.8333 [Detonators]
                           )

                         = 1.02
Outbound 8 Tags on post
Inbound 7 Posts tagging this
Connections 16 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 56
Base Node Influence 1.1429
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
21.29% (28.32T overall)
  • This Post (21.29%)
  • Detonators (11.41%)
  • The Incredibly Boring Band (9.51%)
  • Etc Etc (7.60%)
  • Paul Maxwell (6.08%)
  • Paul McIlwaine (1.52%)
  • Blasting machines (1.52%)
  • Electrical detonators (1.52%)
  • Military detonators (1.52%)
  • Railway detonators (1.52%)
  • Tearjerkers (0.38%)
  • Brian Rawson (0.38%)
  • Howard Ingram (2) (0.38%)
  • Paul Maxwell (2) (0.38%)
  • Nigel Hamilton (0.38%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Protex 18.63%Howard Ingram 15.97%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
6.69% (1.02 overall)
  • This Post (6.69%)
  • Etc Etc (7.32%)
  • Paul Maxwell (5.85%)
  • Tearjerkers (5.85%)
  • Brian Rawson (5.85%)
  • Howard Ingram (2) (5.85%)
  • Paul Maxwell (2) (5.85%)
  • Paul McIlwaine (5.85%)
  • Nigel Hamilton (5.85%)
  • Protex (5.85%)
  • The Incredibly Boring Band (5.85%)
  • Blasting machines (5.85%)
  • Electrical detonators (5.85%)
  • Military detonators (5.85%)
  • Railway detonators (5.85%)
  • Howard Ingram (5.02%)
  • Detonators (4.88%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Etc Etc ↗
Str: 20Inf: 1.25
Paul Maxwell ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Tearjerkers ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Brian Rawson ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Howard Ingram (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Paul Maxwell (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Paul McIlwaine ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Nigel Hamilton ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Protex ↗
Str: 49Inf: 1
The Incredibly Boring Band ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Blasting machines ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Electrical detonators ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Military detonators ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Railway detonators ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Howard Ingram ↗
Str: 42Inf: 0.8571
Detonators ↗
Str: 30Inf: 0.8333
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Detonators ↗
Str: 30Inf: 0.8333
Howard Ingram ↗
Str: 42Inf: 0.8571
Railway detonators ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Military detonators ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Electrical detonators ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Blasting machines ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
The Incredibly Boring Band ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Protex ↗
Str: 49Inf: 1
Nigel Hamilton ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Paul McIlwaine ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Paul Maxwell (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Howard Ingram (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Brian Rawson ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Tearjerkers ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Paul Maxwell ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Etc Etc ↗
Str: 20Inf: 1.25

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (8)
Brian Rawson
Howard Ingram
BROKEN LINK
Howard Ingram (2)
Nigel Hamilton
Paul Maxwell
Paul Maxwell (2)
Paul McIlwaine
Tearjerkers
Inbound Posts (7)
Paul Maxwell
Tearjerkers
Brian Rawson
Howard Ingram (2)
Paul Maxwell (2)
Paul McIlwaine
Nigel Hamilton
Last calculated: Jun 27, 6:31 PM
43

Related Content

Topics

  • Blasting machines
  • Electrical detonators
  • Military detonators
  • Railway detonators
  • Detonators
  • Howard Ingram