Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Bram Tchaikovsky
Peter Bramall
Deke Leonard’s IcebergMartin AceRichard WernhamAndy McMasterNick Garvey

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 1 hour ago
Comments: 0

Darragh Lennon
Last login: 1 week ago
Comments: 0

Cathal Kennedy
Last login: 2 weeks ago
Comments: 0

jacierlogyn
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

The Motors

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Bram Tchaikovsky
    Bram Tchaikovsky band photo
  • Deke Leonard’s Iceberg

Connected Musicians

  • Andy McMaster
  • Martin Ace
  • Nick Garvey
  • Peter Bramall
    Peter Bramall band photo
  • Richard Wernham

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
12.95% of network
(1.74M)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (12.95%)
  • Bram Tchaikovsky (18.65%)
  • Peter Bramall (2.07%)
  • Martin Ace (2.07%)
  • Andy McMaster (0.52%)
  • Nick Garvey (0.52%)
  • Richard Wernham (0.52%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Deke Leonard's Iceberg 62.69%
Influence Score
i
12.50% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (12.50%)
  • Andy McMaster (12.50%)
  • Nick Garvey (12.50%)
  • Peter Bramall (12.50%)
  • Martin Ace (12.50%)
  • Richard Wernham (12.50%)
  • Bram Tchaikovsky (12.50%)
  • Deke Leonard's Iceberg (12.50%)
Direct Connections 10

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 5) = 5
$outbound = max(1, 5) = 5

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 5 * 5 = 25
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 5 / 5 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 7 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 25 *
                           ( 1 [Andy McMaster] *
                            1 [Nick Garvey] *
                            4 [Peter Bramall] *
                            4 [Martin Ace] *
                            1 [Richard Wernham] *
                            36 [Bram Tchaikovsky] *
                            121 [Deke Leonard's Iceberg]
                           )

                         = 1.74M

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Andy McMaster] *
                            1 [Nick Garvey] *
                            1 [Peter Bramall] *
                            1 [Martin Ace] *
                            1 [Richard Wernham] *
                            1 [Bram Tchaikovsky] *
                            1 [Deke Leonard's Iceberg]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 5 Tags on post
Inbound 5 Posts tagging this
Connections 7 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 25
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
12.95% (1.74M overall)
  • This Post (12.95%)
  • Bram Tchaikovsky (18.65%)
  • Peter Bramall (2.07%)
  • Martin Ace (2.07%)
  • Andy McMaster (0.52%)
  • Nick Garvey (0.52%)
  • Richard Wernham (0.52%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Deke Leonard's Iceberg 62.69%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
12.50% (1 overall)
  • This Post (12.50%)
  • Andy McMaster (12.50%)
  • Nick Garvey (12.50%)
  • Peter Bramall (12.50%)
  • Martin Ace (12.50%)
  • Richard Wernham (12.50%)
  • Bram Tchaikovsky (12.50%)
  • Deke Leonard's Iceberg (12.50%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Andy McMaster ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Nick Garvey ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Peter Bramall ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Martin Ace ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Richard Wernham ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Bram Tchaikovsky ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1
Deke Leonard's Iceberg ↗
Str: 121Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Deke Leonard's Iceberg ↗
Str: 121Inf: 1
Bram Tchaikovsky ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1
Richard Wernham ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Martin Ace ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Peter Bramall ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Nick Garvey ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Andy McMaster ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (5)
Andy McMaster
Martin Ace
Nick Garvey
Peter Bramall
Richard Wernham
Inbound Posts (5)
Andy McMaster
Nick Garvey
Peter Bramall
Martin Ace
Richard Wernham
Last calculated: Jul 28, 9:13 PM
58

Related Content

No related content found.