Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

The CathedralsDean HopperThe TalleysConnie HopperKim HopperThe Trio (13)Kirk TalleyCathedralsClaude Hopper

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 2 days ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 6 days ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

The Hoppers

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Cathedrals
  • The Cathedrals
  • The Talleys
  • The Trio (13)

Connected Musicians

  • Claude Hopper
  • Connie Hopper
  • Dean Hopper
  • Kirk Talley

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
6.46% of network
(973.44M)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (6.46%)
  • Kirk Talley (6.46%)
  • The Talleys (4.13%)
  • The Trio (13) (1.03%)
  • Claude Hopper (0.26%)
  • Connie Hopper (0.26%)
  • Dean Hopper (0.26%)
  • Kim Hopper (0.26%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
The Cathedrals 43.67%Cathedrals 37.21%
Influence Score
i
10.00% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (10.00%)
  • Kirk Talley (10.00%)
  • Claude Hopper (10.00%)
  • Connie Hopper (10.00%)
  • Dean Hopper (10.00%)
  • Kim Hopper (10.00%)
  • The Cathedrals (10.00%)
  • Cathedrals (10.00%)
  • The Trio (13) (10.00%)
  • The Talleys (10.00%)
Direct Connections 10

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 5) = 5
$outbound = max(1, 5) = 5

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 5 * 5 = 25
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 5 / 5 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 9 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 25 *
                           ( 25 [Kirk Talley] *
                            1 [Claude Hopper] *
                            1 [Connie Hopper] *
                            1 [Dean Hopper] *
                            1 [Kim Hopper] *
                            169 [The Cathedrals] *
                            144 [Cathedrals] *
                            4 [The Trio (13)] *
                            16 [The Talleys]
                           )

                         = 973.44M

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Kirk Talley] *
                            1 [Claude Hopper] *
                            1 [Connie Hopper] *
                            1 [Dean Hopper] *
                            1 [Kim Hopper] *
                            1 [The Cathedrals] *
                            1 [Cathedrals] *
                            1 [The Trio (13)] *
                            1 [The Talleys]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 5 Tags on post
Inbound 5 Posts tagging this
Connections 9 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 25
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
6.46% (973.44M overall)
  • This Post (6.46%)
  • Kirk Talley (6.46%)
  • The Talleys (4.13%)
  • The Trio (13) (1.03%)
  • Claude Hopper (0.26%)
  • Connie Hopper (0.26%)
  • Dean Hopper (0.26%)
  • Kim Hopper (0.26%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
The Cathedrals 43.67%Cathedrals 37.21%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
10.00% (1 overall)
  • This Post (10.00%)
  • Kirk Talley (10.00%)
  • Claude Hopper (10.00%)
  • Connie Hopper (10.00%)
  • Dean Hopper (10.00%)
  • Kim Hopper (10.00%)
  • The Cathedrals (10.00%)
  • Cathedrals (10.00%)
  • The Trio (13) (10.00%)
  • The Talleys (10.00%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Kirk Talley ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Claude Hopper ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Connie Hopper ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Dean Hopper ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Kim Hopper ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
The Cathedrals ↗
Str: 169Inf: 1
Cathedrals ↗
Str: 144Inf: 1
The Trio (13) ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
The Talleys ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
The Talleys ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
The Trio (13) ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Cathedrals ↗
Str: 144Inf: 1
The Cathedrals ↗
Str: 169Inf: 1
Kim Hopper ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Dean Hopper ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Connie Hopper ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Claude Hopper ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Kirk Talley ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (5)
Claude Hopper
Connie Hopper
Dean Hopper
Kim Hopper
Kirk Talley
Inbound Posts (5)
Kirk Talley
Claude Hopper
Connie Hopper
Dean Hopper
Kim Hopper
Last calculated: Jun 12, 7:13 AM
19

Related Content

Figures

  • Kim Hopper