Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

MulligansNov 12 1992 Surf WeaselBlue BabiesJames JenkinsNov 8 1992 Surf WeaselPablo VidelaCHRIS NASHSteve CottonUnease

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Francesca Ladybird
Last login: 3 days ago
Comments: 0

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 6 days ago
Comments: 0

Matthew Leech
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 1

Jessica
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Darragh Lennon
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Cathal Kennedy
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Surf Weasel

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Unease

Connected Musicians

  • CHRIS NASH
  • James Jenkins
  • Pablo Videla
  • Steve Cotton

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
51.43% of network
(62.2K)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (51.43%)
  • Nov 8 1992 Surf Weasel (12.86%)
  • Nov 12 1992 Surf Weasel (5.71%)
  • Blue Babies (5.71%)
  • CHRIS NASH (1.43%)
  • Steve Cotton (1.43%)
  • Pablo Videla (1.43%)
  • James Jenkins (1.43%)
  • Unease (1.43%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Mulligans 17.14%
Influence Score
i
10.26% of network
(0.75)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (10.26%)
  • CHRIS NASH (10.26%)
  • Nov 12 1992 Surf Weasel (10.26%)
  • Nov 8 1992 Surf Weasel (10.26%)
  • Steve Cotton (10.26%)
  • Pablo Videla (10.26%)
  • James Jenkins (10.26%)
  • Unease (10.26%)
  • Blue Babies (10.26%)
  • Mulligans (7.69%)
Direct Connections 12

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 6) = 6
$outbound = max(1, 6) = 6

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 6 * 6 = 36
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 6 / 6 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 9 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 36 *
                           ( 1 [CHRIS NASH] *
                            4 [Nov 12 1992 Surf Weasel] *
                            9 [Nov 8 1992 Surf Weasel] *
                            1 [Steve Cotton] *
                            1 [Pablo Videla] *
                            1 [James Jenkins] *
                            1 [Unease] *
                            4 [Blue Babies] *
                            12 [Mulligans]
                           )

                         = 62.2K

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [CHRIS NASH] *
                            1 [Nov 12 1992 Surf Weasel] *
                            1 [Nov 8 1992 Surf Weasel] *
                            1 [Steve Cotton] *
                            1 [Pablo Videla] *
                            1 [James Jenkins] *
                            1 [Unease] *
                            1 [Blue Babies] *
                            0.75 [Mulligans]
                           )

                         = 0.75
Outbound 6 Tags on post
Inbound 6 Posts tagging this
Connections 9 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 36
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
51.43% (62.2K overall)
  • This Post (51.43%)
  • Nov 8 1992 Surf Weasel (12.86%)
  • Nov 12 1992 Surf Weasel (5.71%)
  • Blue Babies (5.71%)
  • CHRIS NASH (1.43%)
  • Steve Cotton (1.43%)
  • Pablo Videla (1.43%)
  • James Jenkins (1.43%)
  • Unease (1.43%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Mulligans 17.14%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
10.26% (0.75 overall)
  • This Post (10.26%)
  • CHRIS NASH (10.26%)
  • Nov 12 1992 Surf Weasel (10.26%)
  • Nov 8 1992 Surf Weasel (10.26%)
  • Steve Cotton (10.26%)
  • Pablo Videla (10.26%)
  • James Jenkins (10.26%)
  • Unease (10.26%)
  • Blue Babies (10.26%)
  • Mulligans (7.69%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
CHRIS NASH ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Nov 12 1992 Surf Weasel ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Nov 8 1992 Surf Weasel ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Steve Cotton ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Pablo Videla ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
James Jenkins ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Unease ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Blue Babies ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Mulligans ↗
Str: 12Inf: 0.75
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Mulligans ↗
Str: 12Inf: 0.75
Blue Babies ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Unease ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
James Jenkins ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Pablo Videla ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Steve Cotton ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Nov 8 1992 Surf Weasel ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Nov 12 1992 Surf Weasel ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
CHRIS NASH ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (6)
CHRIS NASH
James Jenkins
Nov 12 1992 Surf Weasel
Nov 8 1992 Surf Weasel
Pablo Videla
Steve Cotton
Inbound Posts (6)
CHRIS NASH
Nov 12 1992 Surf Weasel
Nov 8 1992 Surf Weasel
Steve Cotton
Pablo Videla
James Jenkins
Last calculated: Sep 3, 9:11 AM
46

Related Content

Showcases

  • Nov 12 1992 Surf Weasel
  • Nov 8 1992 Surf Weasel

Venues

  • Blue Babies
  • Mulligans