Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Talulah GoshMark RobinsonDan OxenbergJim SpringMark HansonDan SearingJon ShereSteve ShafelJohn Dugan

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 7 hours ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 2 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Supreme Dicks

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Talulah Gosh

Connected Musicians

  • Dan Oxenberg
  • Dan Searing
  • Jim Spring
  • John Dugan
  • Jon Shere
  • Mark Hanson
  • Mark Robinson
  • Steve Shafel

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
48.85% of network
(14.3K)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (48.85%)
  • Mark Robinson (3.05%)
  • Dan Searing (0.76%)
  • John Dugan (0.76%)
  • Jon Shere (0.76%)
  • Dan Oxenberg (0.76%)
  • Jim Spring (0.76%)
  • Mark Hanson (0.76%)
  • Steve Shafel (0.76%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Talulah Gosh 42.75%
Influence Score
i
9.86% of network
(1.14)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (9.86%)
  • Talulah Gosh (11.27%)
  • Mark Robinson (9.86%)
  • Dan Searing (9.86%)
  • John Dugan (9.86%)
  • Jon Shere (9.86%)
  • Dan Oxenberg (9.86%)
  • Jim Spring (9.86%)
  • Mark Hanson (9.86%)
  • Steve Shafel (9.86%)
Direct Connections 16

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 8) = 8
$outbound = max(1, 8) = 8

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 8 * 8 = 64
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 8 / 8 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 9 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 64 *
                           ( 56 [Talulah Gosh] *
                            4 [Mark Robinson] *
                            1 [Dan Searing] *
                            1 [John Dugan] *
                            1 [Jon Shere] *
                            1 [Dan Oxenberg] *
                            1 [Jim Spring] *
                            1 [Mark Hanson] *
                            1 [Steve Shafel]
                           )

                         = 14.3K

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1.14 [Talulah Gosh] *
                            1 [Mark Robinson] *
                            1 [Dan Searing] *
                            1 [John Dugan] *
                            1 [Jon Shere] *
                            1 [Dan Oxenberg] *
                            1 [Jim Spring] *
                            1 [Mark Hanson] *
                            1 [Steve Shafel]
                           )

                         = 1.14
Outbound 8 Tags on post
Inbound 8 Posts tagging this
Connections 9 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 64
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
48.85% (14.3K overall)
  • This Post (48.85%)
  • Mark Robinson (3.05%)
  • Dan Searing (0.76%)
  • John Dugan (0.76%)
  • Jon Shere (0.76%)
  • Dan Oxenberg (0.76%)
  • Jim Spring (0.76%)
  • Mark Hanson (0.76%)
  • Steve Shafel (0.76%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Talulah Gosh 42.75%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
9.86% (1.14 overall)
  • This Post (9.86%)
  • Talulah Gosh (11.27%)
  • Mark Robinson (9.86%)
  • Dan Searing (9.86%)
  • John Dugan (9.86%)
  • Jon Shere (9.86%)
  • Dan Oxenberg (9.86%)
  • Jim Spring (9.86%)
  • Mark Hanson (9.86%)
  • Steve Shafel (9.86%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Talulah Gosh ↗
Str: 56Inf: 1.14
Mark Robinson ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Dan Searing ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
John Dugan ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Jon Shere ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Dan Oxenberg ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Jim Spring ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Mark Hanson ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Steve Shafel ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Steve Shafel ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Mark Hanson ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Jim Spring ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Dan Oxenberg ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Jon Shere ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
John Dugan ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Dan Searing ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Mark Robinson ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Talulah Gosh ↗
Str: 56Inf: 1.14

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (8)
Dan Oxenberg
Dan Searing
Jim Spring
John Dugan
Jon Shere
Mark Hanson
Mark Robinson
Steve Shafel
Inbound Posts (8)
Mark Robinson
Dan Searing
John Dugan
Jon Shere
Dan Oxenberg
Jim Spring
Mark Hanson
Steve Shafel
Last calculated: Jun 21, 11:36 PM
33

Related Content

No related content found.