Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Dan RochesterNeil Wilkinson (3)La Mort (2)CruciamentumNinkharsagDave Wilkinson (6)Gordon WebsterTom Spencer (7)Paul Swaddle

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 41 minutes ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 1 week ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Spartan Warrior

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Cruciamentum
  • Ninkharsag

Connected Musicians

  • Dan Rochester
  • Dave Wilkinson (6)
  • Gordon Webster
  • La Mort (2)
  • Neil Wilkinson (3)
  • Paul Swaddle
  • Tom Spencer (7)

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
35.51% of network
(540.2K)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (35.51%)
  • Dan Rochester (6.52%)
  • Dave Wilkinson (6) (0.72%)
  • Gordon Webster (0.72%)
  • La Mort (2) (0.72%)
  • Neil Wilkinson (3) (0.72%)
  • Paul Swaddle (0.72%)
  • Tom Spencer (7) (0.72%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Cruciamentum 35.51%Ninkharsag 18.12%
Influence Score
i
10.00% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (10.00%)
  • Dan Rochester (10.00%)
  • Dave Wilkinson (6) (10.00%)
  • Gordon Webster (10.00%)
  • La Mort (2) (10.00%)
  • Neil Wilkinson (3) (10.00%)
  • Paul Swaddle (10.00%)
  • Tom Spencer (7) (10.00%)
  • Cruciamentum (10.00%)
  • Ninkharsag (10.00%)
Direct Connections 14

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 7) = 7
$outbound = max(1, 7) = 7

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 7 * 7 = 49
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 7 / 7 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 9 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 49 *
                           ( 9 [Dan Rochester] *
                            1 [Dave Wilkinson (6)] *
                            1 [Gordon Webster] *
                            1 [La Mort (2)] *
                            1 [Neil Wilkinson (3)] *
                            1 [Paul Swaddle] *
                            1 [Tom Spencer (7)] *
                            49 [Cruciamentum] *
                            25 [Ninkharsag]
                           )

                         = 540.2K

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Dan Rochester] *
                            1 [Dave Wilkinson (6)] *
                            1 [Gordon Webster] *
                            1 [La Mort (2)] *
                            1 [Neil Wilkinson (3)] *
                            1 [Paul Swaddle] *
                            1 [Tom Spencer (7)] *
                            1 [Cruciamentum] *
                            1 [Ninkharsag]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 7 Tags on post
Inbound 7 Posts tagging this
Connections 9 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 49
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
35.51% (540.2K overall)
  • This Post (35.51%)
  • Dan Rochester (6.52%)
  • Dave Wilkinson (6) (0.72%)
  • Gordon Webster (0.72%)
  • La Mort (2) (0.72%)
  • Neil Wilkinson (3) (0.72%)
  • Paul Swaddle (0.72%)
  • Tom Spencer (7) (0.72%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Cruciamentum 35.51%Ninkharsag 18.12%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
10.00% (1 overall)
  • This Post (10.00%)
  • Dan Rochester (10.00%)
  • Dave Wilkinson (6) (10.00%)
  • Gordon Webster (10.00%)
  • La Mort (2) (10.00%)
  • Neil Wilkinson (3) (10.00%)
  • Paul Swaddle (10.00%)
  • Tom Spencer (7) (10.00%)
  • Cruciamentum (10.00%)
  • Ninkharsag (10.00%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Dan Rochester ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Dave Wilkinson (6) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Gordon Webster ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
La Mort (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Neil Wilkinson (3) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Paul Swaddle ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Tom Spencer (7) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Cruciamentum ↗
Str: 49Inf: 1
Ninkharsag ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Ninkharsag ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Cruciamentum ↗
Str: 49Inf: 1
Tom Spencer (7) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Paul Swaddle ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Neil Wilkinson (3) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
La Mort (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Gordon Webster ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Dave Wilkinson (6) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Dan Rochester ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (7)
Dan Rochester
Dave Wilkinson (6)
Gordon Webster
La Mort (2)
Neil Wilkinson (3)
Paul Swaddle
Tom Spencer (7)
Inbound Posts (7)
Dan Rochester
Dave Wilkinson (6)
Gordon Webster
La Mort (2)
Neil Wilkinson (3)
Paul Swaddle
Tom Spencer (7)
Last calculated: Jun 15, 7:52 PM
30

Related Content

No related content found.