Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Stephen Leacock
General FiascoThe TidesPaul QuinnAndrew HayesStephen Leacock (2)Enda StrathernPaul McMillanStuart BellShane Davey

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 7 hours ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 2 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Owen Strathern

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • General Fiasco
  • The Tides

Connected Musicians

  • Andrew Hayes
  • Enda Strathern
  • Paul McMillan
  • Paul Quinn
  • Shane Davey
  • Stephen Leacock
    Stephen Leacock band photo
  • Stephen Leacock (2)
  • Stuart Bell

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
3.05% of network
(31.36M)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (3.05%)
  • Stephen Leacock (19.08%)
  • Paul Quinn (19.08%)
  • The Tides (12.21%)
  • Andrew Hayes (3.05%)
  • Stuart Bell (3.05%)
  • Enda Strathern (0.76%)
  • Shane Davey (0.76%)
  • Stephen Leacock (2) (0.76%)
  • Paul McMillan (0.76%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
General Fiasco 37.40%
Influence Score
i
9.09% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (9.09%)
  • General Fiasco (9.09%)
  • Stephen Leacock (9.09%)
  • Andrew Hayes (9.09%)
  • Enda Strathern (9.09%)
  • Shane Davey (9.09%)
  • Stuart Bell (9.09%)
  • Stephen Leacock (2) (9.09%)
  • The Tides (9.09%)
  • Paul Quinn (9.09%)
  • Paul McMillan (9.09%)
Direct Connections 4

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 2) = 2
$outbound = max(1, 2) = 2

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 2 * 2 = 4
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 2 / 2 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 10 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 4 *
                           ( 49 [General Fiasco] *
                            25 [Stephen Leacock] *
                            4 [Andrew Hayes] *
                            1 [Enda Strathern] *
                            1 [Shane Davey] *
                            4 [Stuart Bell] *
                            1 [Stephen Leacock (2)] *
                            16 [The Tides] *
                            25 [Paul Quinn] *
                            1 [Paul McMillan]
                           )

                         = 31.36M

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [General Fiasco] *
                            1 [Stephen Leacock] *
                            1 [Andrew Hayes] *
                            1 [Enda Strathern] *
                            1 [Shane Davey] *
                            1 [Stuart Bell] *
                            1 [Stephen Leacock (2)] *
                            1 [The Tides] *
                            1 [Paul Quinn] *
                            1 [Paul McMillan]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 2 Tags on post
Inbound 2 Posts tagging this
Connections 10 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 4
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
3.05% (31.36M overall)
  • This Post (3.05%)
  • Stephen Leacock (19.08%)
  • Paul Quinn (19.08%)
  • The Tides (12.21%)
  • Andrew Hayes (3.05%)
  • Stuart Bell (3.05%)
  • Enda Strathern (0.76%)
  • Shane Davey (0.76%)
  • Stephen Leacock (2) (0.76%)
  • Paul McMillan (0.76%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
General Fiasco 37.40%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
9.09% (1 overall)
  • This Post (9.09%)
  • General Fiasco (9.09%)
  • Stephen Leacock (9.09%)
  • Andrew Hayes (9.09%)
  • Enda Strathern (9.09%)
  • Shane Davey (9.09%)
  • Stuart Bell (9.09%)
  • Stephen Leacock (2) (9.09%)
  • The Tides (9.09%)
  • Paul Quinn (9.09%)
  • Paul McMillan (9.09%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
General Fiasco ↗
Str: 49Inf: 1
Stephen Leacock ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Andrew Hayes ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Enda Strathern ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Shane Davey ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Stuart Bell ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Stephen Leacock (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
The Tides ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Paul Quinn ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Paul McMillan ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Paul McMillan ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Paul Quinn ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
The Tides ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Stephen Leacock (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Stuart Bell ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Shane Davey ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Enda Strathern ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Andrew Hayes ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Stephen Leacock ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
General Fiasco ↗
Str: 49Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (2)
General Fiasco
The Tides
Inbound Posts (2)
General Fiasco
The Tides
Last calculated: Jun 21, 11:07 PM
28

Related Content

No related content found.