Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Broken HopeScott CreekmoreMichael EisenhauerJeff McGullamEric SeillerRob CharrierDave Harrington (2)Paul BenignoSkip McGullamTom Brandner

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 17 hours ago
Comments: 0

Darragh Lennon
Last login: 2 days ago
Comments: 0

Cathal Kennedy
Last login: 1 week ago
Comments: 0

jacierlogyn
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Num Skull

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Broken Hope

Connected Musicians

  • Dave Harrington (2)
  • Eric Seiller
  • Jeff McGullam
  • Michael Eisenhauer
  • Paul Benigno
  • Rob Charrier
  • Scott Creekmore
  • Skip McGullam
  • Tom Brandner

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
29.67% of network
(58.3K)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (29.67%)
  • Scott Creekmore (1.47%)
  • Dave Harrington (2) (0.37%)
  • Eric Seiller (0.37%)
  • Jeff McGullam (0.37%)
  • Michael Eisenhauer (0.37%)
  • Paul Benigno (0.37%)
  • Rob Charrier (0.37%)
  • Skip McGullam (0.37%)
  • Tom Brandner (0.37%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Broken Hope 65.93%
Influence Score
i
9.26% of network
(0.8)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (9.26%)
  • Scott Creekmore (9.26%)
  • Dave Harrington (2) (9.26%)
  • Eric Seiller (9.26%)
  • Jeff McGullam (9.26%)
  • Michael Eisenhauer (9.26%)
  • Paul Benigno (9.26%)
  • Rob Charrier (9.26%)
  • Skip McGullam (9.26%)
  • Tom Brandner (9.26%)
  • Broken Hope (7.41%)
Direct Connections 18

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 9) = 9
$outbound = max(1, 9) = 9

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 9 * 9 = 81
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 9 / 9 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 10 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 81 *
                           ( 4 [Scott Creekmore] *
                            1 [Dave Harrington (2)] *
                            1 [Eric Seiller] *
                            1 [Jeff McGullam] *
                            1 [Michael Eisenhauer] *
                            1 [Paul Benigno] *
                            1 [Rob Charrier] *
                            1 [Skip McGullam] *
                            1 [Tom Brandner] *
                            180 [Broken Hope]
                           )

                         = 58.3K

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Scott Creekmore] *
                            1 [Dave Harrington (2)] *
                            1 [Eric Seiller] *
                            1 [Jeff McGullam] *
                            1 [Michael Eisenhauer] *
                            1 [Paul Benigno] *
                            1 [Rob Charrier] *
                            1 [Skip McGullam] *
                            1 [Tom Brandner] *
                            0.8 [Broken Hope]
                           )

                         = 0.8
Outbound 9 Tags on post
Inbound 9 Posts tagging this
Connections 10 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 81
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
29.67% (58.3K overall)
  • This Post (29.67%)
  • Scott Creekmore (1.47%)
  • Dave Harrington (2) (0.37%)
  • Eric Seiller (0.37%)
  • Jeff McGullam (0.37%)
  • Michael Eisenhauer (0.37%)
  • Paul Benigno (0.37%)
  • Rob Charrier (0.37%)
  • Skip McGullam (0.37%)
  • Tom Brandner (0.37%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Broken Hope 65.93%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
9.26% (0.8 overall)
  • This Post (9.26%)
  • Scott Creekmore (9.26%)
  • Dave Harrington (2) (9.26%)
  • Eric Seiller (9.26%)
  • Jeff McGullam (9.26%)
  • Michael Eisenhauer (9.26%)
  • Paul Benigno (9.26%)
  • Rob Charrier (9.26%)
  • Skip McGullam (9.26%)
  • Tom Brandner (9.26%)
  • Broken Hope (7.41%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Scott Creekmore ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Dave Harrington (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Eric Seiller ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Jeff McGullam ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Michael Eisenhauer ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Paul Benigno ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Rob Charrier ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Skip McGullam ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Tom Brandner ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Broken Hope ↗
Str: 180Inf: 0.8
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Broken Hope ↗
Str: 180Inf: 0.8
Tom Brandner ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Skip McGullam ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Rob Charrier ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Paul Benigno ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Michael Eisenhauer ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Jeff McGullam ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Eric Seiller ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Dave Harrington (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Scott Creekmore ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (9)
Dave Harrington (2)
Eric Seiller
Jeff McGullam
Michael Eisenhauer
Paul Benigno
Rob Charrier
Scott Creekmore
Skip McGullam
Tom Brandner
Inbound Posts (9)
Scott Creekmore
Dave Harrington (2)
Eric Seiller
Jeff McGullam
Michael Eisenhauer
Paul Benigno
Rob Charrier
Skip McGullam
Tom Brandner
Last calculated: Jul 23, 9:00 AM
29

Related Content

No related content found.