Skip to content

Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Pussycat Dolls
Chrystina Sayers
The Pussycat Dolls
Natalie Mejia
Tiffany AndersonTiffanie Anderson

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 2 days ago
Comments: 0

Francesca Ladybird
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Matthew Leech
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 1

Jessica
Last login: 3 months ago
Comments: 0

Darragh Lennon
Last login: 3 months ago
Comments: 0

Cathal Kennedy
Last login: 3 months ago
Comments: 0

Nichole Cordova

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Pussycat Dolls
    Pussycat Dolls band photo
  • The Pussycat Dolls
    The Pussycat Dolls band photo
  • Tiffanie Anderson
  • Tiffany Anderson

Connected Musicians

  • Chrystina Sayers
  • Natalie Mejia
    Natalie Mejia band photo

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
3.75% of network
(1.87B)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (3.75%)
  • The Pussycat Dolls (33.72%)
  • Natalie Mejia (5.85%)
  • Chrystina Sayers (2.11%)
  • Tiffany Anderson (0.94%)
  • Tiffanie Anderson (0.94%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Pussycat Dolls 52.69%
Influence Score
i
14.29% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (14.29%)
  • Pussycat Dolls (14.29%)
  • The Pussycat Dolls (14.29%)
  • Chrystina Sayers (14.29%)
  • Natalie Mejia (14.29%)
  • Tiffany Anderson (14.29%)
  • Tiffanie Anderson (14.29%)
Direct Connections 8

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 4) = 4
$outbound = max(1, 4) = 4

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 4 * 4 = 16
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 4 / 4 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 6 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 16 *
                           ( 225 [Pussycat Dolls] *
                            144 [The Pussycat Dolls] *
                            9 [Chrystina Sayers] *
                            25 [Natalie Mejia] *
                            4 [Tiffany Anderson] *
                            4 [Tiffanie Anderson]
                           )

                         = 1.87B

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Pussycat Dolls] *
                            1 [The Pussycat Dolls] *
                            1 [Chrystina Sayers] *
                            1 [Natalie Mejia] *
                            1 [Tiffany Anderson] *
                            1 [Tiffanie Anderson]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 4 Tags on post
Inbound 4 Posts tagging this
Connections 6 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 16
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
3.75% (1.87B overall)
  • This Post (3.75%)
  • The Pussycat Dolls (33.72%)
  • Natalie Mejia (5.85%)
  • Chrystina Sayers (2.11%)
  • Tiffany Anderson (0.94%)
  • Tiffanie Anderson (0.94%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Pussycat Dolls 52.69%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
14.29% (1 overall)
  • This Post (14.29%)
  • Pussycat Dolls (14.29%)
  • The Pussycat Dolls (14.29%)
  • Chrystina Sayers (14.29%)
  • Natalie Mejia (14.29%)
  • Tiffany Anderson (14.29%)
  • Tiffanie Anderson (14.29%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Pussycat Dolls ↗
Str: 225Inf: 1
The Pussycat Dolls ↗
Str: 144Inf: 1
Chrystina Sayers ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Natalie Mejia ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Tiffany Anderson ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Tiffanie Anderson ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Tiffanie Anderson ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Tiffany Anderson ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Natalie Mejia ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Chrystina Sayers ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
The Pussycat Dolls ↗
Str: 144Inf: 1
Pussycat Dolls ↗
Str: 225Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (4)
Chrystina Sayers
Natalie Mejia
Tiffanie Anderson
Tiffany Anderson
Inbound Posts (4)
Chrystina Sayers
Natalie Mejia
Tiffany Anderson
Tiffanie Anderson
Last calculated: Oct 15, 2:20 AM
29

Related Content

No related content found.

A Muso community