How is this calculated?
The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.
// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 6) = 6
$outbound = max(1, 6) = 6
// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 6 * 6 = 36
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 6 / 6 = 1
// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 23 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
= 36 *
( 14 [In The Woods...] *
1 [Defy Christ] *
1 [Bjørn Dencker Gjerde] *
25 [Christer André Cederberg] *
1 [Eirik Havnes] *
25 [Ronny Hovland] *
100 [Svein Egil Hatlevik] *
1 [Drawn] *
4 [Animal Alpha] *
1 [Stille Opprà ̧r] *
169 [Dødheimsgard] *
4 [Fleurety] *
25 [Self Spiller] *
16 [Umoral] *
9 [Aphrodisiac (3)] *
1 [MAZ (18)] *
1 [Norwegian Noise Orchestra] *
1 [Stagnant Waters] *
1 [Pronounced "Sex"] *
169 [Grimfist] *
1 [Arvas] *
1 [Corona Borealis] *
462 [Gorgoroth]
)
= 2.39 x 10^19
Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
= 1 *
( 14 [In The Woods...] *
1 [Defy Christ] *
1 [Bjørn Dencker Gjerde] *
1 [Christer André Cederberg] *
1 [Eirik Havnes] *
1 [Ronny Hovland] *
1 [Svein Egil Hatlevik] *
1 [Drawn] *
1 [Animal Alpha] *
1 [Stille Opprà ̧r] *
1 [Dødheimsgard] *
1 [Fleurety] *
1 [Self Spiller] *
1 [Umoral] *
1 [Aphrodisiac (3)] *
1 [MAZ (18)] *
1 [Norwegian Noise Orchestra] *
1 [Stagnant Waters] *
1 [Pronounced "Sex"] *
1 [Grimfist] *
1 [Arvas] *
1 [Corona Borealis] *
0.9545 [Gorgoroth]
)
= 13.36
Outbound
6
Tags on post
Inbound
6
Posts tagging this
Connections
23
Total nodes
Base Node Strength
36
Base Node Influence
1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
3.37%
(2.39 × 1019 overall)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)Gorgoroth 43.22%Dødheimsgard 15.81%Grimfist 15.81%Svein Egil Hatlevik 9.35%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)In The Woods... 37.88%
Connected Network Hierarchy
Sort list by:
Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)