Skip to content

Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

California Brakemen
Fox Patedmund o’brienMick ConnollyPatsy fineganpat dromgoolepeter halpenny

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 1 week ago
Comments: 0

Francesca Ladybird
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Matthew Leech
Last login: 3 months ago
Comments: 1

Jessica
Last login: 3 months ago
Comments: 0

Darragh Lennon
Last login: 3 months ago
Comments: 0

Cathal Kennedy
Last login: 4 months ago
Comments: 0

Midnighters Showband

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • California Brakemen
    California Brakemen band photo

Connected Musicians

  • edmund o’brien
  • Fox Pat
  • Mick Connolly
  • pat dromgoole
  • Patsy finegan
  • peter halpenny

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
21.69% of network
(17.4K)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (21.69%)
  • Mick Connolly (2.41%)
  • Fox Pat (0.60%)
  • edmund o'brien (0.60%)
  • peter halpenny (0.60%)
  • Patsy finegan (0.60%)
  • pat dromgoole (0.60%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
California Brakemen 72.89%
Influence Score
i
12.50% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (12.50%)
  • Fox Pat (12.50%)
  • Mick Connolly (12.50%)
  • edmund o'brien (12.50%)
  • peter halpenny (12.50%)
  • Patsy finegan (12.50%)
  • pat dromgoole (12.50%)
  • California Brakemen (12.50%)
Direct Connections 12

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 6) = 6
$outbound = max(1, 6) = 6

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 6 * 6 = 36
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 6 / 6 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 7 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 36 *
                           ( 1 [Fox Pat] *
                            4 [Mick Connolly] *
                            1 [edmund o'brien] *
                            1 [peter halpenny] *
                            1 [Patsy finegan] *
                            1 [pat dromgoole] *
                            121 [California Brakemen]
                           )

                         = 17.4K

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Fox Pat] *
                            1 [Mick Connolly] *
                            1 [edmund o'brien] *
                            1 [peter halpenny] *
                            1 [Patsy finegan] *
                            1 [pat dromgoole] *
                            1 [California Brakemen]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 6 Tags on post
Inbound 6 Posts tagging this
Connections 7 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 36
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
21.69% (17.4K overall)
  • This Post (21.69%)
  • Mick Connolly (2.41%)
  • Fox Pat (0.60%)
  • edmund o'brien (0.60%)
  • peter halpenny (0.60%)
  • Patsy finegan (0.60%)
  • pat dromgoole (0.60%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
California Brakemen 72.89%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
12.50% (1 overall)
  • This Post (12.50%)
  • Fox Pat (12.50%)
  • Mick Connolly (12.50%)
  • edmund o'brien (12.50%)
  • peter halpenny (12.50%)
  • Patsy finegan (12.50%)
  • pat dromgoole (12.50%)
  • California Brakemen (12.50%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Fox Pat ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Mick Connolly ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
edmund o'brien ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
peter halpenny ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Patsy finegan ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
pat dromgoole ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
California Brakemen ↗
Str: 121Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
California Brakemen ↗
Str: 121Inf: 1
pat dromgoole ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Patsy finegan ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
peter halpenny ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
edmund o'brien ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Mick Connolly ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Fox Pat ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (6)
edmund o'brien
Fox Pat
Mick Connolly
pat dromgoole
Patsy finegan
peter halpenny
Inbound Posts (6)
Fox Pat
Mick Connolly
edmund o'brien
peter halpenny
Patsy finegan
pat dromgoole
Last calculated: Nov 1, 1:20 AM
78

Related Content

No related content found.

A Muso community