Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

The Moody Blues
Charlie CaseyCOUM TransmissionsSteve TannettJohn LaceyAndrew Tweedie
John Lodge
Albert AwfulMorgan Webster

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 8 hours ago
Comments: 0

Darragh Lennon
Last login: 5 days ago
Comments: 0

Cathal Kennedy
Last login: 2 weeks ago
Comments: 0

jacierlogyn
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Menace

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • COUM Transmissions
  • The Moody Blues
    The Moody Blues band photo

Connected Musicians

  • Albert Awful
  • Andrew Tweedie
  • Charlie Casey
  • John Lacey
  • Morgan Webster
  • Steve Tannett

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
9.72% of network
(22.92M)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (9.72%)
  • John Lodge (0.79%)
  • John Lacey (0.79%)
  • Albert Awful (0.20%)
  • Andrew Tweedie (0.20%)
  • Charlie Casey (0.20%)
  • Morgan Webster (0.20%)
  • Steve Tannett (0.20%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
The Moody Blues 71.63%COUM Transmissions 16.07%
Influence Score
i
10.00% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (10.00%)
  • Albert Awful (10.00%)
  • Andrew Tweedie (10.00%)
  • John Lodge (10.00%)
  • Charlie Casey (10.00%)
  • John Lacey (10.00%)
  • Morgan Webster (10.00%)
  • Steve Tannett (10.00%)
  • The Moody Blues (10.00%)
  • COUM Transmissions (10.00%)
Direct Connections 14

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 7) = 7
$outbound = max(1, 7) = 7

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 7 * 7 = 49
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 7 / 7 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 9 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 49 *
                           ( 1 [Albert Awful] *
                            1 [Andrew Tweedie] *
                            4 [John Lodge] *
                            1 [Charlie Casey] *
                            4 [John Lacey] *
                            1 [Morgan Webster] *
                            1 [Steve Tannett] *
                            361 [The Moody Blues] *
                            81 [COUM Transmissions]
                           )

                         = 22.92M

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Albert Awful] *
                            1 [Andrew Tweedie] *
                            1 [John Lodge] *
                            1 [Charlie Casey] *
                            1 [John Lacey] *
                            1 [Morgan Webster] *
                            1 [Steve Tannett] *
                            1 [The Moody Blues] *
                            1 [COUM Transmissions]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 7 Tags on post
Inbound 7 Posts tagging this
Connections 9 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 49
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
9.72% (22.92M overall)
  • This Post (9.72%)
  • John Lodge (0.79%)
  • John Lacey (0.79%)
  • Albert Awful (0.20%)
  • Andrew Tweedie (0.20%)
  • Charlie Casey (0.20%)
  • Morgan Webster (0.20%)
  • Steve Tannett (0.20%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
The Moody Blues 71.63%COUM Transmissions 16.07%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
10.00% (1 overall)
  • This Post (10.00%)
  • Albert Awful (10.00%)
  • Andrew Tweedie (10.00%)
  • John Lodge (10.00%)
  • Charlie Casey (10.00%)
  • John Lacey (10.00%)
  • Morgan Webster (10.00%)
  • Steve Tannett (10.00%)
  • The Moody Blues (10.00%)
  • COUM Transmissions (10.00%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Albert Awful ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Andrew Tweedie ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
John Lodge ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Charlie Casey ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
John Lacey ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Morgan Webster ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Steve Tannett ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
The Moody Blues ↗
Str: 361Inf: 1
COUM Transmissions ↗
Str: 81Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
COUM Transmissions ↗
Str: 81Inf: 1
The Moody Blues ↗
Str: 361Inf: 1
Steve Tannett ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Morgan Webster ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
John Lacey ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Charlie Casey ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
John Lodge ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Andrew Tweedie ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Albert Awful ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (7)
Albert Awful
Andrew Tweedie
Charlie Casey
John Lacey
John Lodge
Morgan Webster
Steve Tannett
Inbound Posts (7)
Albert Awful
Andrew Tweedie
John Lodge
Charlie Casey
John Lacey
Morgan Webster
Steve Tannett
Last calculated: Jul 27, 5:07 AM
38

Related Content

Figures

  • John Lodge