Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Red Harvest
Ondskapt
NattdalLRZJ. MFix (13)H. (2)Kim CarlssonJohan GabrielsonRickard Öström

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 11 hours ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 1 week ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Lifelover

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Ondskapt
    Ondskapt band photo
  • Red Harvest

Connected Musicians

  • Fix (13)
  • H. (2)
  • J. M
  • Johan Gabrielson
  • Kim Carlsson
  • LRZ
  • Nattdal
  • Rickard Öström

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
18.29% of network
(4.19M)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (18.29%)
  • LRZ (1.14%)
  • Nattdal (1.14%)
  • Fix (13) (0.29%)
  • H. (2) (0.29%)
  • J. M (0.29%)
  • Johan Gabrielson (0.29%)
  • Kim Carlsson (0.29%)
  • Rickard Öström (0.29%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Ondskapt 73.14%Red Harvest 4.57%
Influence Score
i
9.09% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (9.09%)
  • Red Harvest (9.09%)
  • LRZ (9.09%)
  • Fix (13) (9.09%)
  • H. (2) (9.09%)
  • J. M (9.09%)
  • Johan Gabrielson (9.09%)
  • Kim Carlsson (9.09%)
  • Ondskapt (9.09%)
  • Nattdal (9.09%)
  • Rickard Öström (9.09%)
Direct Connections 16

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 8) = 8
$outbound = max(1, 8) = 8

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 8 * 8 = 64
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 8 / 8 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 10 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 64 *
                           ( 16 [Red Harvest] *
                            4 [LRZ] *
                            1 [Fix (13)] *
                            1 [H. (2)] *
                            1 [J. M] *
                            1 [Johan Gabrielson] *
                            1 [Kim Carlsson] *
                            256 [Ondskapt] *
                            4 [Nattdal] *
                            1 [Rickard Öström]
                           )

                         = 4.19M

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Red Harvest] *
                            1 [LRZ] *
                            1 [Fix (13)] *
                            1 [H. (2)] *
                            1 [J. M] *
                            1 [Johan Gabrielson] *
                            1 [Kim Carlsson] *
                            1 [Ondskapt] *
                            1 [Nattdal] *
                            1 [Rickard Öström]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 8 Tags on post
Inbound 8 Posts tagging this
Connections 10 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 64
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
18.29% (4.19M overall)
  • This Post (18.29%)
  • LRZ (1.14%)
  • Nattdal (1.14%)
  • Fix (13) (0.29%)
  • H. (2) (0.29%)
  • J. M (0.29%)
  • Johan Gabrielson (0.29%)
  • Kim Carlsson (0.29%)
  • Rickard Öström (0.29%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Ondskapt 73.14%Red Harvest 4.57%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
9.09% (1 overall)
  • This Post (9.09%)
  • Red Harvest (9.09%)
  • LRZ (9.09%)
  • Fix (13) (9.09%)
  • H. (2) (9.09%)
  • J. M (9.09%)
  • Johan Gabrielson (9.09%)
  • Kim Carlsson (9.09%)
  • Ondskapt (9.09%)
  • Nattdal (9.09%)
  • Rickard Öström (9.09%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Red Harvest ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
LRZ ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Fix (13) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
H. (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
J. M ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Johan Gabrielson ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Kim Carlsson ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Ondskapt ↗
Str: 256Inf: 1
Nattdal ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Rickard Öström ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Rickard Öström ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Nattdal ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Ondskapt ↗
Str: 256Inf: 1
Kim Carlsson ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Johan Gabrielson ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
J. M ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
H. (2) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Fix (13) ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
LRZ ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Red Harvest ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (8)
Fix (13)
H. (2)
J. M
Johan Gabrielson
Kim Carlsson
LRZ
Nattdal
Rickard Öström
Inbound Posts (8)
LRZ
Fix (13)
H. (2)
J. M
Johan Gabrielson
Kim Carlsson
Nattdal
Rickard Öström
Last calculated: Jun 14, 4:37 AM
29

Related Content

No related content found.