Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

The Hollies
Tony Hicks
Graham Nash
Crosby and NashBACK DOORClarke Hicks NashCrosby & NashThe Red HotsNash & YoungStills & Nash

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 5 hours ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 1 week ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

L. Ransford

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • BACK DOOR
  • Clarke Hicks Nash
  • Crosby & Nash
  • Crosby and Nash
  • Nash & Young
  • Stills & Nash
  • The Hollies
    The Hollies band photo
  • The Red Hots

Connected Musicians

  • Graham Nash
    Graham Nash band photo
  • Tony Hicks
    Tony Hicks band photo

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
0.43% of network
(59.93T)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (0.43%)
  • Graham Nash (6.87%)
  • The Red Hots (5.26%)
  • BACK DOOR (2.69%)
  • Tony Hicks (1.72%)
  • Stills & Nash (1.72%)
  • Nash & Young (1.72%)
  • Clarke Hicks Nash (0.43%)
  • Crosby & Nash (0.43%)
  • Crosby and Nash (0.43%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
The Hollies 78.30%
Influence Score
i
9.09% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (9.09%)
  • The Hollies (9.09%)
  • Tony Hicks (9.09%)
  • Clarke Hicks Nash (9.09%)
  • BACK DOOR (9.09%)
  • Crosby & Nash (9.09%)
  • Graham Nash (9.09%)
  • Crosby and Nash (9.09%)
  • The Red Hots (9.09%)
  • Stills & Nash (9.09%)
  • Nash & Young (9.09%)
Direct Connections 4

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 2) = 2
$outbound = max(1, 2) = 2

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 2 * 2 = 4
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 2 / 2 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 10 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 4 *
                           ( 729 [The Hollies] *
                            16 [Tony Hicks] *
                            4 [Clarke Hicks Nash] *
                            25 [BACK DOOR] *
                            4 [Crosby & Nash] *
                            64 [Graham Nash] *
                            4 [Crosby and Nash] *
                            49 [The Red Hots] *
                            16 [Stills & Nash] *
                            16 [Nash & Young]
                           )

                         = 59.93T

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [The Hollies] *
                            1 [Tony Hicks] *
                            1 [Clarke Hicks Nash] *
                            1 [BACK DOOR] *
                            1 [Crosby & Nash] *
                            1 [Graham Nash] *
                            1 [Crosby and Nash] *
                            1 [The Red Hots] *
                            1 [Stills & Nash] *
                            1 [Nash & Young]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 2 Tags on post
Inbound 2 Posts tagging this
Connections 10 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 4
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
0.43% (59.93T overall)
  • This Post (0.43%)
  • Graham Nash (6.87%)
  • The Red Hots (5.26%)
  • BACK DOOR (2.69%)
  • Tony Hicks (1.72%)
  • Stills & Nash (1.72%)
  • Nash & Young (1.72%)
  • Clarke Hicks Nash (0.43%)
  • Crosby & Nash (0.43%)
  • Crosby and Nash (0.43%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
The Hollies 78.30%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
9.09% (1 overall)
  • This Post (9.09%)
  • The Hollies (9.09%)
  • Tony Hicks (9.09%)
  • Clarke Hicks Nash (9.09%)
  • BACK DOOR (9.09%)
  • Crosby & Nash (9.09%)
  • Graham Nash (9.09%)
  • Crosby and Nash (9.09%)
  • The Red Hots (9.09%)
  • Stills & Nash (9.09%)
  • Nash & Young (9.09%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
The Hollies ↗
Str: 729Inf: 1
Tony Hicks ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Clarke Hicks Nash ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
BACK DOOR ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Crosby & Nash ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Graham Nash ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1
Crosby and Nash ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
The Red Hots ↗
Str: 49Inf: 1
Stills & Nash ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Nash & Young ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Nash & Young ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Stills & Nash ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
The Red Hots ↗
Str: 49Inf: 1
Crosby and Nash ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Graham Nash ↗
Str: 64Inf: 1
Crosby & Nash ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
BACK DOOR ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Clarke Hicks Nash ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Tony Hicks ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
The Hollies ↗
Str: 729Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (2)
Graham Nash
Tony Hicks
Inbound Posts (2)
Graham Nash
Tony Hicks
Last calculated: Jun 16, 12:02 AM
28

Related Content

No related content found.