Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Jim McNeely TentetEd NeumeisterMichel Camilo Big BandReconstruction (4)Ed Neumeister QuintetEd Neumeister QuartetKarl Ratzer Quintet

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 3 days ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 2 months ago
Comments: 0

Karl Ratzer Septet

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Ed Neumeister Quartet
  • Ed Neumeister Quintet
  • Jim McNeely Tentet
  • Karl Ratzer Quintet
  • Michel Camilo Big Band
  • Reconstruction (4)

Connected Musicians

  • Ed Neumeister

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
0.72% of network
(28.9M)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (0.72%)
  • Ed Neumeister (35.25%)
  • Michel Camilo Big Band (25.90%)
  • Ed Neumeister Quartet (11.51%)
  • Jim McNeely Tentet (11.51%)
  • Reconstruction (4) (11.51%)
  • Ed Neumeister Quintet (2.88%)
  • Karl Ratzer Quintet (0.72%)
Influence Score
i
12.50% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (12.50%)
  • Michel Camilo Big Band (12.50%)
  • Ed Neumeister (12.50%)
  • Ed Neumeister Quartet (12.50%)
  • Ed Neumeister Quintet (12.50%)
  • Jim McNeely Tentet (12.50%)
  • Karl Ratzer Quintet (12.50%)
  • Reconstruction (4) (12.50%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 7 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 36 [Michel Camilo Big Band] *
                            49 [Ed Neumeister] *
                            16 [Ed Neumeister Quartet] *
                            4 [Ed Neumeister Quintet] *
                            16 [Jim McNeely Tentet] *
                            1 [Karl Ratzer Quintet] *
                            16 [Reconstruction (4)]
                           )

                         = 28.9M

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Michel Camilo Big Band] *
                            1 [Ed Neumeister] *
                            1 [Ed Neumeister Quartet] *
                            1 [Ed Neumeister Quintet] *
                            1 [Jim McNeely Tentet] *
                            1 [Karl Ratzer Quintet] *
                            1 [Reconstruction (4)]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 7 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
0.72% (28.9M overall)
  • This Post (0.72%)
  • Ed Neumeister (35.25%)
  • Michel Camilo Big Band (25.90%)
  • Ed Neumeister Quartet (11.51%)
  • Jim McNeely Tentet (11.51%)
  • Reconstruction (4) (11.51%)
  • Ed Neumeister Quintet (2.88%)
  • Karl Ratzer Quintet (0.72%)
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
12.50% (1 overall)
  • This Post (12.50%)
  • Michel Camilo Big Band (12.50%)
  • Ed Neumeister (12.50%)
  • Ed Neumeister Quartet (12.50%)
  • Ed Neumeister Quintet (12.50%)
  • Jim McNeely Tentet (12.50%)
  • Karl Ratzer Quintet (12.50%)
  • Reconstruction (4) (12.50%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Michel Camilo Big Band ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1
Ed Neumeister ↗
Str: 49Inf: 1
Ed Neumeister Quartet ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Ed Neumeister Quintet ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Jim McNeely Tentet ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Karl Ratzer Quintet ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Reconstruction (4) ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Reconstruction (4) ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Karl Ratzer Quintet ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Jim McNeely Tentet ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Ed Neumeister Quintet ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Ed Neumeister Quartet ↗
Str: 16Inf: 1
Ed Neumeister ↗
Str: 49Inf: 1
Michel Camilo Big Band ↗
Str: 36Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
Ed Neumeister
Inbound Posts (1)
Ed Neumeister
Last calculated: Jun 26, 3:09 PM
29

Related Content

No related content found.