Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Dan Lilker
Shane Embury
Venomous ConceptJohn Cooke (5)
Danny Herrera
Kevin SharpTom DringDanny LilkerRoger Osborne

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 2 days ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 2 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

John Cooke

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Venomous Concept

Connected Musicians

  • Dan Lilker
    Dan Lilker band photo
  • Danny Herrera
    Danny Herrera band photo
  • Danny Lilker
  • John Cooke (5)
  • Kevin Sharp
  • Roger Osborne
  • Shane Embury
    Shane Embury band photo
  • Tom Dring

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
0.08% of network
(15.12T)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (0.08%)
  • Venomous Concept (6.49%)
  • Kevin Sharp (2.00%)
  • Roger Osborne (0.72%)
  • Danny Herrera (0.32%)
  • John Cooke (5) (0.32%)
  • Tom Dring (0.08%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Shane Embury 32.03%Danny Lilker 32.03%Dan Lilker 25.94%
Influence Score
i
10.00% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (10.00%)
  • Shane Embury (10.00%)
  • Danny Herrera (10.00%)
  • Kevin Sharp (10.00%)
  • Venomous Concept (10.00%)
  • Dan Lilker (10.00%)
  • Danny Lilker (10.00%)
  • John Cooke (5) (10.00%)
  • Roger Osborne (10.00%)
  • Tom Dring (10.00%)
Direct Connections 2

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 1) = 1
$outbound = max(1, 1) = 1

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 1 * 1 = 1
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 1 / 1 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 9 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 400 [Shane Embury] *
                            4 [Danny Herrera] *
                            25 [Kevin Sharp] *
                            81 [Venomous Concept] *
                            324 [Dan Lilker] *
                            400 [Danny Lilker] *
                            4 [John Cooke (5)] *
                            9 [Roger Osborne] *
                            1 [Tom Dring]
                           )

                         = 15.12T

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Shane Embury] *
                            1 [Danny Herrera] *
                            1 [Kevin Sharp] *
                            1 [Venomous Concept] *
                            1 [Dan Lilker] *
                            1 [Danny Lilker] *
                            1 [John Cooke (5)] *
                            1 [Roger Osborne] *
                            1 [Tom Dring]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 1 Tags on post
Inbound 1 Posts tagging this
Connections 9 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 1
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
0.08% (15.12T overall)
  • This Post (0.08%)
  • Venomous Concept (6.49%)
  • Kevin Sharp (2.00%)
  • Roger Osborne (0.72%)
  • Danny Herrera (0.32%)
  • John Cooke (5) (0.32%)
  • Tom Dring (0.08%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Shane Embury 32.03%Danny Lilker 32.03%Dan Lilker 25.94%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
10.00% (1 overall)
  • This Post (10.00%)
  • Shane Embury (10.00%)
  • Danny Herrera (10.00%)
  • Kevin Sharp (10.00%)
  • Venomous Concept (10.00%)
  • Dan Lilker (10.00%)
  • Danny Lilker (10.00%)
  • John Cooke (5) (10.00%)
  • Roger Osborne (10.00%)
  • Tom Dring (10.00%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Shane Embury ↗
Str: 400Inf: 1
Danny Herrera ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Kevin Sharp ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Venomous Concept ↗
Str: 81Inf: 1
Dan Lilker ↗
Str: 324Inf: 1
Danny Lilker ↗
Str: 400Inf: 1
John Cooke (5) ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Roger Osborne ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Tom Dring ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Tom Dring ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Roger Osborne ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
John Cooke (5) ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Danny Lilker ↗
Str: 400Inf: 1
Dan Lilker ↗
Str: 324Inf: 1
Venomous Concept ↗
Str: 81Inf: 1
Kevin Sharp ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Danny Herrera ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Shane Embury ↗
Str: 400Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (1)
Venomous Concept
Inbound Posts (1)
Venomous Concept
Last calculated: Jun 17, 2:37 PM
32

Related Content

No related content found.