Muso

Directory About
Continue with Google
Continue with with Facebook

Top Related Posts

Matthew Tuck
Bullet for My Valentine
Michael “Moose” ThomasAxewoundMichael Paget (3)Jay JamesNick CrandleMatt Tuck

Recent Logins

View Members Directory

Tadhg Kelleher
Last login: 1 day ago
Comments: 0

Eileen Lally
Last login: 5 days ago
Comments: 0

Özkan Konu
Last login: 3 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Anne Marie Bevan
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Kevin Greene
Last login: 4 weeks ago
Comments: 0

Seán Millar
Last login: 1 month ago
Comments: 0

Jeff Killed John

Loading Graph...
Press Spacebar to toggle layout
Join the conversation

💬 Know something?

Sign in to leave a note, add a photo, or make a connection.

Continue with Google Continue with Facebook

Keep Muso free

Muso is built by one person, for the love of it. no investors — just your support.

€10
Covers an hour of research
Most popular
€25
Keeps the archive running
€50
Funds a full week of work
✎ Enter my own amount
€5
per month · cancel any time

You'll confirm the amount on the next screen

Donate €25 →
Secure checkout via Stripe  ·  No account needed

Connected Bands/Artists

  • Axewound
  • Bullet for My Valentine
    Bullet for My Valentine band photo
  • Matt Tuck

Connected Musicians

  • Jay James
  • Matthew Tuck
  • Michael “Moose” Thomas
  • Michael Paget (3)
  • Nick Crandle

Analyzing Network Connections...

Network Profile

Overall Strength
i
20.81% of network
(377.91M)
Strength Breakdown
  • This Post (20.81%)
  • Axewound (14.45%)
  • Matthew Tuck (5.20%)
  • Matt Tuck (5.20%)
  • Jay James (2.31%)
  • Michael "Moose" Thomas (2.31%)
  • Michael Paget (3) (2.31%)
  • Nick Crandle (0.58%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Bullet for My Valentine 46.82%
Influence Score
i
11.11% of network
(1)
Influence Breakdown
  • This Post (11.11%)
  • Bullet for My Valentine (11.11%)
  • Matthew Tuck (11.11%)
  • Axewound (11.11%)
  • Jay James (11.11%)
  • Matt Tuck (11.11%)
  • Michael "Moose" Thomas (11.11%)
  • Michael Paget (3) (11.11%)
  • Nick Crandle (11.11%)
Direct Connections 12

Node & Network Details

How is this calculated?

The math continuously tracks how strongly this post is connected to the rest of the network. Every tag forms a 2-way link. The base stats determine personal node strength, and the pie charts below show this node's share against its direct neighbours.

// 1. Base variables (floored at 1 to prevent zero-multiplication math errors)
$inbound = max(1, 6) = 6
$outbound = max(1, 6) = 6

// 2. Node Base Values (Local connection strength)
Base_Strength (PV) = $inbound * $outbound = 6 * 6 = 36
Base_Influence (IV) = $inbound / $outbound = 6 / 6 = 1

// 3. Exponential Network Values (accumulating 8 direct neighbours)
Network_Strength (CV) = Base_PV * (Neighbour_1_PV * Neighbour_2_PV * ...)
                         = 36 *
                           ( 81 [Bullet for My Valentine] *
                            9 [Matthew Tuck] *
                            25 [Axewound] *
                            4 [Jay James] *
                            9 [Matt Tuck] *
                            4 [Michael "Moose" Thomas] *
                            4 [Michael Paget (3)] *
                            1 [Nick Crandle]
                           )

                         = 377.91M

Network_Influence (TV) = Base_IV * (Neighbour_1_IV * Neighbour_2_IV * ...)
                         = 1 *
                           ( 1 [Bullet for My Valentine] *
                            1 [Matthew Tuck] *
                            1 [Axewound] *
                            1 [Jay James] *
                            1 [Matt Tuck] *
                            1 [Michael "Moose" Thomas] *
                            1 [Michael Paget (3)] *
                            1 [Nick Crandle]
                           )

                         = 1
Outbound 6 Tags on post
Inbound 6 Posts tagging this
Connections 8 Total nodes
Base Node Strength 36
Base Node Influence 1
Strength Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
20.81% (377.91M overall)
  • This Post (20.81%)
  • Axewound (14.45%)
  • Matthew Tuck (5.20%)
  • Matt Tuck (5.20%)
  • Jay James (2.31%)
  • Michael "Moose" Thomas (2.31%)
  • Michael Paget (3) (2.31%)
  • Nick Crandle (0.58%)
Dominant nodes (excluded from chart)
Bullet for My Valentine 46.82%
Influence Share (vs Direct Neighbours)
11.11% (1 overall)
  • This Post (11.11%)
  • Bullet for My Valentine (11.11%)
  • Matthew Tuck (11.11%)
  • Axewound (11.11%)
  • Jay James (11.11%)
  • Matt Tuck (11.11%)
  • Michael "Moose" Thomas (11.11%)
  • Michael Paget (3) (11.11%)
  • Nick Crandle (11.11%)

Connected Network Hierarchy

Sort list by:
Top Network Boosters (Highest Multipliers)
Bullet for My Valentine ↗
Str: 81Inf: 1
Matthew Tuck ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Axewound ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Jay James ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Matt Tuck ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Michael "Moose" Thomas ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Michael Paget (3) ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Nick Crandle ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Weakest Connections (Lowest Multipliers)
Nick Crandle ↗
Str: 1Inf: 1
Michael Paget (3) ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Michael "Moose" Thomas ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Matt Tuck ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Jay James ↗
Str: 4Inf: 1
Axewound ↗
Str: 25Inf: 1
Matthew Tuck ↗
Str: 9Inf: 1
Bullet for My Valentine ↗
Str: 81Inf: 1

Connection Health Audit (Red = broken 1-way link)

Outbound Tags (6)
Jay James
Matt Tuck
Matthew Tuck
Michael "Moose" Thomas
Michael Paget (3)
Nick Crandle
Inbound Posts (6)
Matthew Tuck
Jay James
Matt Tuck
Michael "Moose" Thomas
Michael Paget (3)
Nick Crandle
Last calculated: Jun 11, 5:11 PM
27

Related Content

No related content found.